Por vezes, uma decisão terrível do mundo passa por nós sem que a gente se atente que ela é uma desastrosa decisão dos homens com consequências extremamente maléficas. Isso é o caso da aprovação pelo Reino Unido da técnica de crianças filhas de três pais.
Todo mundo quer comida que não seja geneticamente modificada, mas seres humanos geneticamente modificados estão liberados.
É o que nos explica Rebecca Taylor, especialista em bioética, no site Creative Minority Report.
Ela está ainda mais assustada com o silêncio da Igreja, dos grupos pró-vida e dos católicos em geral. Que tal um sínodo sobre bioética e não um sínodo sobre casamento gay?.
Vejamos:
Silence
on Three-Parent Embryos is Deafening
I will be honest. I am tired. I am angry. I am
frustrated. This is likely an uncharacteristically
emotional post because, after nearly a decade of
writing about biotechnology, I am uncharacteristically horrified.
The UK has officially approved the creation of embryos with three
genetic parents,
and babies created with this technique are likely to
be born within the next year.
This is unprecedented.
The UK government has officially sanctioned the
germ-line genetic engineering of its citizens and their decedents. British children (and their children, and
their grandchildren) will be genetic engineering experiments. Horrifying.
Many experts are concerned about the safety of the technique. They think the invasive, cloning-like procedure is sure to cause birth defects. Even a well-known pro-ESC, pro-cloning scientist urged the UK not to move forward. The reality is that any baby not developing normally will be aborted, and we will likely never hear about the "failures" of this radical experimentation. Horrifying.
Others are rightly concerned that this will open the
door to more invasive and extensive engineering. It is not out of the realm of
possibility, especially since the UK
just changed the definition of "genetic
modification" to allow this technique to bypass current laws against germ-line genetic modifications
in humans. Future linguistic gymnastics surrounding human genetic engineering is probable.
Horrifying.
But what I find even
more horrifying is the silence. Silence from Catholics, pro-lifers, and the general
public. I find it deafening.
In August, I wrote a piece posted to LifeNews warning pro-lifers to be careful where they send their donations for the Ice Bucket Challenge. It
pointed out how money given to the ALS Association may, I emphasize may, end up funding one study that used stem
cells from an aborted fetus. Close to 50,000 shares.
I recently wrote a post for LifeNews on
four things people can do to stop the certain creation of genetically-modified kids with the three-parent
technique: 257 shares.
A couple of petitions about the possible release of
genetically-modified mosquitoes in Florida to curb the spread of Dengue fever got about 160,000
signatures.
But recent petition to
the FDA, urging the regulator to prohibit the genetic engineering of human beings, that should have gotten millions
of signatures only got 250.
Another world-wide petition to the UK House of Lords that should have gotten
millions of signatures failed to reach their 100,000 signature
goal.
On a more personal level, every five seconds I see a
post in my Facebook feed about how genetically-modified food is bad for you, and yet when
I post (repeatedly) about the three-parent embryo: crickets. I get on average 3
likes for any article about the genetic engineering of human beings.
But I post this picture, with the comment
"#catholic problems," and all my hundreds of
friends, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, go crazy for
it.
Even more infuriating is that fact that, at the very
same time that the UK approves the genetic engineering of the next generation (and the
next, and the next), Hershey's has been so hounded by food purists on social media that
the confectioner has given into the pressure to remove any ingredients that come from
genetically-modified organisms.
Great. We will be eating GMO-free chocolate (reading
about the spread of Dengue fever) while we blissfully ignore the creation of
genetically-modified kids.
There are probably a
million reasons why there is this crazy disconnect from what could be one of the greatest
turning points in human history. None of them matter. There is no excuse. We should be producing
a deafening roar that eclipses that showered on Hershey's. Instead there are
crickets.
We should be ashamed, but we aren't. When the FDA
decides to revisit the three-parent technique so that it can be used as a new fertility technique, we will turn our backs again and stay silent. By that time probably half of the
U.S. will have laws requiring that GMO foods be labeled.
At that point, I would say we deserve the Brave New World we are going to get.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Certa vez, li uma frase em inglês muito boa para ser colocada quando se abre para comentários. A frase diz: "Say What You Mean, Mean What Say, But Don’t Say it Mean." (Diga o que você realmente quer dizer, com sinceridade, mas não com maldade).