O jornal the London Times anuncia hoje que um grupo de cardeais que apoiaram a eleição do Papa Francisco agora deseja que ele renuncie para evitar um cisma que "seria pior que a reforma protestante". E ainda sugerem que após essa renúncia, assuma o cardeal Pietro Parolin. O jornal relata 12 cardeais defendendo isso e ressalta que o número de cardeais não importa mas sim a influência deles. Também é lembrado que esse grupo de cardeais não é formado por cardeais conservadores, mas apenas por aqueles que estão preocupados com o desmembramento da Igreja.
Finalmente, o jornal lembra que não há chance do Papa Francisco renunciar "pois ele tem um viés autoritário e tentará completar suas reformas"
Vejamos o relato do jornal The London Times:
Anti-reform cardinals ‘want
the Pope to quit’
A
group of cardinals who supported the election of Pope Francis are worried that
his controversial reforms are leading the Catholic church towards a schism and
are planning to appeal to him to step down, a leading Vatican watcher has
claimed.
“A
large part of the cardinals who voted for him is very worried and the curia . .
. that organised his election and has accompanied him thus far, without ever
disassociating itself from him, is cultivating the idea of a moral suasion to
convince him to retire,” Antonio Socci wrote in the Italian newspaper Libero.
The
conservative Catholic author and journalist said that the election four years
ago of Jorge Mario Bergoglio had been backed by progressive German cardinals
and a curia faction impatient with the rule of his predecessor, Pope Benedict
XVI.
It
was the latter faction who now believed that the Pope should resign and who
would like to replace him with Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary
of state, Mr Socci said. He believed that the group numbered around a dozen,
“but the importance of the members counts more than their number”.
“Four
years after Benedict XVI’s renunciation and Bergoglio’s arrival on the scene,
the situation of the Catholic church has become explosive, perhaps really on
the edge of a schism, which could be even more disastrous than Luther’s [who is
today being rehabilitated by the Bergoglio church],” Mr Socci wrote.
What
was significant, he said, was that the doubters were not the conservative
cardinals who had been in open opposition to the Pope since early in his reign.
Putting
pressure on a pope to resign is a crime punishable under canon law, Mr Socci
added, so it was unclear how the moral suasion might be exercised. “The
cardinals are worried that the church could be shattered as an institution.
There are many indirect ways in which the pressure might be exerted.”
The
Pope’s openings to modernity on sexual morality, communion for remarried
Catholics and friendly relations with other religions have opened a gulf
between progressives and traditionalists.
“A
good number of the majority that voted for Bergoglio in 2013 have come to
regret their decision,” one expert on the Vatican said, “but I don’t think it’s
plausible that members of the hierarchy will pressure the Pope to resign. Those
who know him know it would be useless. [He] has a very authoritarian streak. He
won’t resign until he has completed his revolutionary reforms, which are
causing enormous harm.”
Antonio
Pelayo, a Catholic priest who covers the Vatican for Spanish television, said
that there were between ten and twenty conservative cardinals openly opposed to
the Pope’s reforms, but only two or three who had voted for him and who now
regretted it.
•
Marie Collins, an Irish abuse victim, resigned from the Pope’s commission for child
protection yesterday, citing institutional resistance to reform from within the
Vatican curia. She said there were “fine words in public and contrary actions
behind closed doors” and appeared to criticise the Pope for a decision to
reduce sanctions against a perpetrator.
Pro Pope Francis cardinals want him to resign to avoid schism, reports the Times of London
BY DEACON NICK DONNELLY
The London Times newspaper is reporting that a group of cardinals who supported Pope Francis now want him to resign and be replaced by Cardinal Pietro Parolin because they fear his reforms will cause a schism "more disastrous" than the Reformation. The Times article draws on a report by the Vatican expert Antonio Socci, a prominent Italian Catholic journalist.
Antonio Socci reports that it is the curial faction of the Holy See that backed the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio out of "impatience with the rule of his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI" that now wants Pope Francis to resign out of fear of an impending schism. The Times reports:
A large part of the cardinals who voted for him is very worried and the curia . . . that organised his election and has accompanied him thus far, without ever disassociating itself from him, is cultivating the idea of a moral suasion to convince him to retire.
It was the latter faction who now believed that the Pope should resign and who would like to replace him with Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary of state, Mr Socci said. He believed that the group numbered around a dozen, but the importance of the members counts more than their number. Four years after Benedict XVI’s renunciation and Bergoglio’s arrival on the scene, the situation of the Catholic church has become explosive, perhaps really on the edge of a schism, which could be even more disastrous than Luther’s [who is today being rehabilitated by the Bergoglio church].
The cardinals are worried that the church could be shattered as an institution. There are many indirect ways in which the pressure might be exerted.
An expert on the Vatican gave this assessment of the latest development:
A good number of the majority that voted for Bergoglio in 2013 have come to regret their decision, but I don’t think it’s plausible that members of the hierarchy will pressure the Pope to resign. Those who know him know it would be useless. [He] has a very authoritarian streak. He won’t resign until he has completed his revolutionary reforms, which are causing enormous harm.
Antonio Socci reports that the significance of this development is that the group who want Pope Francis to resign are not the "conservative" cardinals who have opposed the Holy Father's innovations, "What was significant, he said, was that the doubters were not the conservative cardinals who had been in open opposition to the Pope since early in his reign."
http://gpsdoagronegocio.blogspot.com.br/2017/03/papa-francisco-muro-cubano-pontes-e.html
ResponderExcluirEsse bando de safado gente busquem a Deus somente ele dá o perdão e a vida eterna esse tal de padre,papa,cardeal são um bando de comedor de arroz feijão mais pecador que eu ou você
ResponderExcluiraproveitemos o tempo de penitência e deixemos de julgar para não ser julgado.
ExcluirFeliz Páscoa, cara Lúcia Vieira.
ExcluirFique com Deus.
Abraço,
Pedro Erik
O cara foi falar a verdade para o mundo , e olha como eles (sociedade) tão a caça de sua cabeça .....0 mundo não pode ficar na mentira acorda humanidade....
ResponderExcluirCaríssimo, por favor, nos diga que tipo de verdade você se refere. Assim, ficaria mais clara a sua argumentação.
ResponderExcluirAbraço,
Pedro Erik
Caro Eric, pelo tom usado , acredito sinceramente que o ilustre desconhecido aí acima, nem sequer sabe o significado da palavra verdade, ele próprio deve ser uma farsa,haja visto que nem coragem de por seu nome e imagem real no comentário ele pôs,portanto, é só mais alienado entupido de mortadela falando besteiras, ou seja, não deve ser levado em consideração.
ExcluirPrimeira visita, blog muito bom. Espero que os haters não venham pra cá...
ResponderExcluirMuito obrigado, Angela, espero que continue gostando do que escrevo.
ExcluirBom, eu controlo os comentários, assim os haters não aparecem para meus ilustres leitores. Fique tranquila.
Abraço,
Pedro
Muda-se o maestro mas a orquestra sempre foi e será a maesma
ResponderExcluir