Papa Francisco como Antipapa

Se alguém me perguntasse como eu definiria o Papa Francisco, eu diria que o Papa Francisco é o papa que não ama os católicos.

Se você lê o que ele costuma dizer em entrevistas, longe dos textos oficiais não escritos por ele, fica claro que ele não ama os católicos ou o catolicismo, e isso por consequência significa que ele não ama Cristo.

Bergoglio já atacou as beatas que rezam os terços nas igrejas,  já atacou católicos leigos que estudam catolicismo, já atacou Cardeais que defendem a doutrina da Igreja, já atacou os bens da Igreja. Ele já falou mal até de Nossa Senhora. E por outro lado, ele costuma elogiar e se inspirar  em todos os que odeiam a Igreja, como muçulmanos, comunistas e abortistas.

Além disso, ele costuma se manifestar nas sombras, recebendo pessoas que atacam a história da Igreja e escrevendo cartas elogiosas a quem quer destruir a doutrina da Igreja.

Finalmente, o desprezo que ele tem pela história e pela doutrina da Igreja é gritante, é aterrorizante. Ele aparenta dizer: "Não sei e tenho raiva de quem sabe" o que significa ser Católico. E assim despreza completamente os ensinamentos de Cristo, defendidos por séculos de tradição.

Hoje, leio mais um artigo que declara que o Papa Francisco é um Antipapa, que o verdadeiro Papa seria ainda Bento XVI.

Em geral, eu não gosto desse tipo de artigo porque despreza o gigantesco erro de Ratizinger, de renunciar ao papado. Talvez tenha sido o maior erro de um papa na história. E assim, ele tem culpa nas confusões feitas por Bergoglio.

Mas aqui vai a argumentação de Jonathan Byrd, que diz que Bergoglio é Antipapa. Byrd é blogueiro do falecido Padre Peter Carota.

O texto é bom porque traz as fontes para se dizer que o Papa Francisco é Antipapa. Serve como base de estudo sobre o tema.

Vejamos o que diz Byrd abaixo:

(Father Peter Carota) was quick to point out things that were contrary to God and didn’t shy away from posting them on this blog.  The most notable one that quickly comes to my mind is his post of: Pope Francis Is Not Saving Souls, But Losing Them.

It seems his entire life was one of stepping on toes and he seemed to be comfortable doing that if he knew what he was saying was Truth.  I don’t believe he would classify what he wrote as Polemics, but they were, most definitely, “hard hitting” and holding nothing back.

It is within this vein, I think the time has come to post something that could be considered Polemic, but in reality, it is not.  The goal of this blog, as Father Carota envisioned, was to help save souls and This continues to be the primary objective.

With that in mind (the good of souls), I think the point has come to publicly comment on Jorge Bergoglio the man that most refer to as Pope Francis.  I do not intend to get into a lengthy discourse concerning him, but to publicly put on record and state my opinion on this matter as I think the time has long since passed and I can no longer be silent on the matter.

In my estimation, for what it is worth, Jorge Bergoglio is an Anti-Pope and Pope Benedict is still the reigning pontiff.  This is a position I have held for at least the last year but wanted to wait for a time to make it publicly.  As time has passed, I have become even more convinced of this.

One of the main line of arguments that is used against those who believe Jorge Bergogio is an Anti-Pope are character attacks against the blogger or person who states the facts.  I have yet to read a clear – concise – rebuttal of any of the bloggers who have raised this.  In fact, it has been quite the opposite which is the usual for Modernists.

I am not going to outline, all of my reasons for my belief, but I will link to others that have done so you can read it for yourself.

I will provide you with four resources that you can view to see the rationale behind this belief.

The first I will point you to is an extremely long post on the RadTrad Thomist site by Fr. Kramer.  You can read that one here.  He goes into great length to show the invalid nature of the resignation of Pope Benedict (with excerpts from his actually address) but also the manifest heresy that come forth from the mouth of Jorge Bergoglio on a seemingly daily basis.

The next one is a shorter post, but the blog also points to the year long battle that it took to come to this conclusion and you can read that one here.

Louie Verrechio at the AKACatholic.com blog has also come out publicly in support of this position.  You read his post here.

And finally, I would like to point out Ann Barnhardt.  She was one of the original bloggers (if not the only one initially) to publicly put this forth and she has several blog posts that are worth reading.

• Vocem Alienorum: The Voice of Antipope Francis Bergoglio Is the Voice of A Stranger
• Cutting the Crap: 32 Questions and Blunt Answers About The Catholic Church and Antipope Bergoglio
• More Sound Reasoning on the Antipope Situation: Coercion and Lies

The above bloggers have put together enough on the topic for you to come to a conclusion. There are many more that I could site but they all use the same basic arguments.  I couldn’t say anything else other than what they have already written, so it seems pointless to outline it all over again on this blog.

It still seems surreal to me to have to even make a post like the above. However, these are the times in which we live.  Our Lord said you will know them by their fruit and I can tell you, the fruit is rotten and putrid.

Reading prophecy which has been approved of by our Holy Mother The Church, one gets the impression, that we are living in the times most of them were speaking about.  The outlook, for the long term, is wonderful as we know that Mary’s Immaculate Heart will triumph and she shall crush the head of Satan.  The outlook for the short term is nothing but the pathway to Golgotha. The mystical bride of Christ is heading to her crucifixion.  Luke 18:18 “…But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?”

I will leave you with a few quotes which seem appropriate.

Saint Vicent Of Lerins once said:

“If one yields ground on any single point of Catholic doctrine, one will later have to yield later in another, and again in another, and so on until such surrenders come to be something normal and acceptable. And when one gets used to rejecting dogma bit by bit, the final result will be the repudiation of it altogether.”

And

“All novelty in faith is a sure mark of heresy.”

And

“True piety admits no other rule than that whatsoever things have been faithfully received from our fathers the same are to be faithfully consigned to our children; and that it is our duty, not to lead religion whither we would, but rather to follow religion whither it leads; and that it is the part of Christian modesty and gravity not to hand down our own beliefs or observances to those who come after us, but to preserve and keep what we have received from those who went before us.”

And

“I cannot sufficiently be astonished that such is the insanity of some men, such the impiety of their blinded understanding, such, finally, their lust after error, that they will not be content with the rule of faith delivered once and for all from antiquity, but must daily seek after something new, and even newer still, and are always longing to add something to religion, or to change it, or to subtract from it!”

And Finally…

“What, then, shall a Catholic Christian do … if some novel contagion attempt to infect no longer a small part of the Church alone but the whole Church alike? He shall then see to it that he cleave unto antiquity, which is now utterly incapable of being seduced by any craft or novelty.”