Por que Texas Acusa Pensilvânia, Geórgia, Michigan e Wisconsin de Fraude Eleitoral Inconstitucional ?

O site Zero Hedge trouxe detalhes sobre ações que sinalizam fraudes durante as eleições para presidente na Geórgia, Pensilvânia, Michigan e Wisconsin que apoiam a ação na Suprema Corte pelo Texas contra estes 4 estados. A análise foi escrita por Robert Madsen.

É muito interessante ver esses detalhes, porque, para mim, só esses dados provam as fraudes. Não precisa nem olhar as evidências de fraude que o artigo colocou, basta olhar para os dados  para cancelar completamente as eleições. Olhem, por exemplo, a distribuição dos votos pelos correios (mail-in ballots). A fraude está clara aí, esconde várias fraudes (votos ilegais (sem assinatura, de mortos, de imigrantes ilegais) , sob pressão, por prêmios, e votos de pessoas que não são cidadãos do estado). E olhem o que fizeram os secretários de estado, usurpando até a própria lei estadual. 

Nos Estados Unidos, eleições não são tratadas em nível federal, e sim estadual, mas eles devem seguir os preceitos constitucionais. A Constituição lá é um pacto entre os estados. Um governador ou mesmo um suprema corte estadual não pode subverter os preceitos eleitorais da constituição.

Antes dos detalhes por cada estado, aqui vai a tradução da conclusão:

Conclusão

Violações significativas da lei eleitoral que foram postas em prática para proteger a fraude eleitoral são suficientes para invalidar os resultados das eleições, independentemente de qualquer evidência que possa ser reunida em um curto espaço de tempo para mostrar o número real de cédulas fraudulentas. A razão indicaria que há um grande número de cédulas fraudulentas que são impossíveis de identificar, razão pela qual as leis eleitorais relativas às cédulas pelo correio foram estabelecidas para começar.

Não há remédio para corrigir a eleição de 3 de novembro porque as cédulas que não aderiram à lei eleitoral não podem ser identificadas como separadas das que o fizeram. Uma contagem precisa das cédulas legais lançadas não pode ser feita. Portanto, conforme determina a Constituição, cabe ao Legislativo de cada estado escolher os eleitores, como fazia no passado. Caso contrário, cada estado pode determinar a não apresentação de eleitores presidenciais.

O processo do Texas alega que as chances de Biden superar a liderança de Trump e ganhar qualquer um dos estados depois que um ponto indicado é de 1 em 1 quatrilhão. E, portanto, a probabilidade de vencer os quatro era de uma em um quatrilhão à quarta potência. O processo não forneceu informações sobre como esse número foi apurado. Isso pode parecer um exagero para alguns. É suficiente afirmar que as chances de ganhar qualquer um dos estados eram altamente improváveis ​​e as chances de ganhar todos os quatro eram extremamente improváveis. 

Por exemplo, se as chances de ganhar qualquer um dos estados fossem numericamente muito menos extremas, mas ainda altamente improváveis, digamos algo como um em vinte, então a chance de fazer isso em todos os quatro estados seria de 1 em 160.000. Vinte grãos em uma jarra: 19 brancos e 1 preto. Alcance sem olhar e tenha a sorte de retirar o feijão preto. As chances de fazer isso novamente são de 1 em 400. 

De qualquer forma, o mérito da ação não depende de nenhum certo nível de probabilidade de Biden superar uma vantagem que havia sido estabelecida às 3h00. no dia seguinte à eleição.

....

Vejamos os detalhes abaixo:

Pennsylvania

Facts:

1. Vote Tally: 3,445,548 for Biden and 3,363,951 for Trump - margin 81,597.

2. Requests for mail-in ballots 70% Democrats and 25% Republicans.

3. Mail-in ballots increased from 266,208 in 2016 to over 3,000,000 in 2020.

Violations of Election Law:

1. The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.

2. PA supreme court changed existing deadline for receiving mail-in ballots from 8:00 PM on the day of election to 3 days after the election and adopted a presumption that non-postmarked ballots be considered as valid.

3. Election officials in Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties did not follow state law permitting poll-watchers to be present for the opening, counting, and recording of mail-in ballots.

4. The Secretary of State directed election officials to remove ballots before 7:00 AM on the day of election in order to “cure” defective mail-in ballots.  This was done only in Democrat majority counties.

5. Election officials did not segregate ballots received after 8:00 PM on election day breaking the promise made to the U.S. Supreme Court thus making it impossible to identify or remove those ballots.

Evidence of Fraud:

1. Ballots with no mailed date: 9,005 (no evidence they were sent to a voter)

2. Ballots returned on or before the mailed date: 58,221

3. Ballots returned one day after the mailed date: 51,200 (Perhaps not impossible, but highly unlikely for the average voter to receive a ballot, fill it out, place it in the mail and have it returned the next day.)

4. On Nov 2, the day before the election, PA reports that 2.7 million ballots had been sent out.  On Nov 4 that number had increased to 3.1 million -- an increase of 400,000 mail-in ballots at election time with literally no reasonable chance of them being used by legitimate voters.

Georgia

Facts:

1. Vote Tally: 2,472,098 for Biden and 2,458,121 for Trump - margin 12,670.

2. Mail-in ballots: 65.32% for Biden and 34.68% for Trump.

3. Mail-in ballots increased from 213,033 in 2016 to 1,305,659 in 2020.

Violations of Election Law:

1. The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.

2. The Secretary of State authorized opening and processing mail-in ballots up to three weeks before election day when the law prohibits that until after the polls open on election day.

3. The Secretary of State materially weakened the security requirements for ballot rejection based on signature verification or other missing information.

Evidence of Fraud:

1. Mail-in ballot rejection rate for missing or inaccurate information or for non-matching signatures decreased from 6.42% in 2016 to .36% in 2020.  Rejecting 2020 ballots at the same rate as 2016 would have resulted in a net gain of 25,587 votes for Trump – twice the number needed to overcome Biden’s count.  With a six-fold increase in the number of mail-in ballots, reason would indicate that the rejection rate would increase, or at least stay the same, with so many first-time mail-in ballots.

Michigan

Facts:

1. Vote Tally: 2,796,702 for Biden and 2,650,695 for Trump - margin 146,007.

2. In 2016 587,618 voters requested mail-in ballots.  In 2020 3.2 million votes were cast by mail-in ballot.

3. Democrats voted by mail at a rate approximately two times that of Republican voters.

Violations of Election Law:

1. The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.

2. The Secretary of State sent out unsolicited ballots to all 7.7 million registered voters contrary to election law which requires a voter to request a mail-in ballot through a process that includes a signature to be matched with the voter registration.

3. The Secretary of State also allowed absentee ballots to be requested online without signature verification.

4. Local election officials in Wayne County -- containing 322,925 more ballots for Biden than for Trump -- opened and processed mail-in ballots without poll-watchers present.

5. Local election officials in Wayne County also ignored the strict election law requirements of placing a written statement or stamp on each ballot envelope indicating that the voter signature was in fact checked and verified with the signature on file with the state.

Evidence of Fraud:

1. 174,384 mail-in ballots in Wayne County had no valid registration number, indicating they likely resulted from election workers running the same ballots through the tabulator multiple times.

2. 71% of Wayne County Absent Voter Counting Boards were unbalanced, where the number of people who checked in did not match the number of ballots cast.

Wisconsin

Facts:

1. Vote Tally: 1,630,716 for Biden and 1,610,151 for Trump - margin 20,565.

2. Mail-in ballots increased from 146,932 in 2016 to 1,275,019 in 2020.

Violations of Election Law:

1. he Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) positioned hundreds of unmanned illegal drop boxes to collect absentee ballots.  (The use of any drop box, manned or unmanned, is directly prohibited by Wisconsin statute.  Any alternate mail-in ballot site “shall be staffed by the municipal clerk or the executive director of the board of election commissioners…”  “Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election.”)

2. The WEC encouraged voters to unlawfully declare themselves “indefinitely confined” in order to avoid security measures like signature verification and photo ID requirements.  Nearly 216,000 voters said they were indefinitely confined in the 2020 election, nearly four times as many as in 2016.

3. Strict laws requiring mail-in voters to certify by signature including the signature of an adult witness were ignored or circumvented by election officials.

Evidence of Fraud:

1. One hundred thousand ballots were supposedly missing and directed to be “found” after election day.