Papa Francisco se Rebaixa para China, Acusa Cardeal Zen Ze-Kiun.

A Igreja Católica, sob o Papa Francisco, voltou a adotar com ênfase a política conhecida como Ostpolitik,que se rebaixa a regimes autoritários, especialmente comunistas, e que resultou no passado em prisões de defensores da fé católica, como o cardeal polonês Stefan Wyszynski, o cardeal húngaro Jozsef Mindszenty, e o cardeal theco Josef Beran. Todos esses três defensores da fé estão em processo de canonização. Mas a Igreja continua se comportando contra aqueles que seguem o caminho deles. E até ataca quem segue esses três prováveis santos da Igreja.

Agora temos o caso da China, que continua destruindo igrejas e seminários cristãos, além de querer determinar quem sãos os bispos da Igreja. Bento XVI lutou contra isso, a frase abaixo é dele. A frase diz: "A autoridade do Papa em apontar quem são os bispos da Igreka foi dada pelo fundador da Igreja, Jesus Cristo, não é uma propriedade do Papa, nem pode ser transferida a outros".

O cardeal Zen Ze-kiun  (foto acima) de Hong Kong que ataca o comportamento da Igreja sob Papa Francisco, que manda aqueles que lutam contra da interferência do estado ateu chinês se calarem.

O Cardeal Zen Ze-Kiun não mede palavras, diz que a Igreja de hoje "dialoga com Herodes".

As declarações do cardeal estão no site DICI, leiam parte abaixo:

China: Cardinal Zen Ze-kiun interprets Vatican diplomacy

On January 11, 2016, EDA published a letter from the blog of Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, aged 84, Bishop Emeritus of Hong Kong, dated December 31, 2015. Cardinal Zen recounts the events of the past year without diplomatic doublespeak: “Over a thousand crosses have been taken down from churches (and in some cases the churches were demolished as well.) After so much time, we can no longer cherish the illusion that this campaign against the cross is only an excess of zeal on the part of some local authority. Several seminaries are no longer open. The students of the National Seminary of Beijing were forced to sign a declaration of fidelity to the independent Catholic church, also promising to concelebrate the Mass with illegitimate bishops (or they would not obtain their diploma at the end of their studies). The government is building, little by little, a Church that is now objectively separate from the Universal Catholic Church. With attractive promises or with threats, it incites the members of the clergy to carry out acts in opposition to the doctrine and the discipline of the Church, against their conscience and their dignity.”

On October 28^th, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State of the Holy See, confirmed to the press that a Vatican delegation, including six persons from the Secretariat of State and the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, had visited Beijing from October 11^th to 16^th, 2015, in order to negotiate with the Chinese government. “It was Fr. Jeroom Heyndrickx who passed on the news in detail. He stated,” writes Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, “’Certain sensitive issues were not dealt with, such as the situation of the bishop of Baoding, Bishop Su Zhemin, still incarcerated, or that of Bishop Ma Daquin, bishop of Shanghai, under house arrest for over three years.’ (Should these problems not have been resolved before beginning any other negotiation? In absence of such a resolution, it can certainly not be affirmed that Beijing has shown proof of goodwill.) ‘Both parties were focused on the problem of the nomination of bishops.’ (Using what model? That of Anyang, where this process includes “democratic election,” the reading of the “decree of nomination from the so-called Chinese Bishops’ Conference,” and the unclear canonical status of a co-consecrating bishop?) ‘After this meeting, the delegation visited the bishop of Beijing, Bishop Li Shan, and the National Seminary where they met Bishop Ma Yinglin.’ (Fr. Heyndrickx claims that these are signs of goodwill from Beijing; I think on the contrary the visits were acts of homage imposed by Beijing.)”

Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun concludes by imparting all the concern he feels at the diplomatic relations of the Secretariat of State with Beijing: “Our clandestine communities are nonexistent in the eyes of the government. But the Vatican itself does not take them into account in negotiations. Is this to grant a request from the Chinese Party? To save the situation, these brothers and sisters are to be abandoned? But they are the healthy members of the Church!” The cardinal recalls that “in early September, some of the faithful from Shanghai who had spent a long time in prison went on a pilgrimage to Rome, accompanied by their relatives, to commemorate the 60^th anniversary of the beginning of the Great Persecution, September 8, 1955. They were told, ‘Don’t draw too much attention to yourselves, the past is past, we must look to the future!” And he adds, “What concerns me is the sight of our illustrious Secretary of State still intoxicated by the miracle ofOstpolitik. Last year, in a eulogy of Cardinal Casaroli, he acclaimed the fact that his predecessor had succeeded in guaranteeing the existence of the Catholic hierarchy in the Communist countries of Eastern Europe. He stated, ‘When choosing candidates for the episcopate, let us choose pastors, not persons who will systematically oppose the regime, who act like gladiators, who love to make a splash on the political stage.’ I wonder, who did Cardinal Parolin have in mind when he made this description? I fear he was thinking of Cardinal Wyszynski, Cardinal Mindszenty and Cardinal Beran. But these were the heroes who defended the faith of their people with courage! (…) When the Holy Innocents were killed, the angel told Joseph to take Mary and their Son to safety. Today, on the contrary, our diplomats would probably advise Joseph to go and dialogue with Herod!”