Monsenhor Nicola Bux, que foi teólogo da Congregação para a Doutrina da Fé do Vaticano, disse que o Papa Francisco está gerando heresias e cismas, que o Papa Francisco deveria fazer um "ato de fé" para evitar que a Igreja entre em cisma. Ele acha difícil que o Papa Francisco faça essa profissão de fé, pois o Papa está transformando a Igreja Católica em igreja protestante.
Além disso, Nicola Bux diz que a situação da Igreja e os perigos dos erros do Papa começaram a exigir uma correção urgente especialmente após o Papa Francisco mudar o Catecismo e declarar que a pena de morte é "inadmissível", mudando uma doutrina da Igreja em favor da pena de morte de 2 mil anos.
Ufa, como fico feliz em ver uma pessoa com experiência no Vaticano dizendo as coias certas (óbvias) e especialmente em destacar a questão da pena de morte que para mim já denunciam o Papa como herético.
Vejam parte do relato abaixo do que disse o monsenhor Nicola Bux, feito pelo site Life News.
Pope Francis has broken with previous popes, causing ‘heresies, schisms’: Vatican theologian
November 15, 2018 (edwardpentin.co.uk) –In a forceful interview with Italian Vaticanist Aldo Maria Valli, Msgr. Nicola Bux has warned that the current pontificate is issuing statements that are generating “heresies, schisms, and controversies of various kinds” and that the Holy Father should issue a profession of faith to restore unity in the Church.
In the interview, published Oct. 13 but overlooked due to the Youth Synod taking place in Rome last month, the theologian consultor to the Congregation for the Causes of Saints said “heretical statements” on marriage, the moral life and reception of the sacraments are now “at the center of a vast debate which is becoming more and more passionate by the day.”
Msgr. Bux said the origin of many of these questioned teachings — highlighted in a September 2017 filial correction and at a Rome conference in April on doctrinal confusion in the Church — is the Pope’s post-synodal apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia, but they have since become “considerably worse and more complicated.”
He said this has led some senior prelates, such as Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, one of the four cardinals to sign the dubia in 2016, to reiterate a call for a “profession of faith on the part of the Pope.”
But Msgr. Bux said this would be difficult to achieve given the Pope’s vision of the Church as a federation of ecclesial communities — something Msgr. Bux described as “a bit like the Protestant communities.”
Since the two synods on the family, the Italian theologian said “two gears” of faith and morality now exist, seen most clearly over whether to give Holy Communion to some “remarried” divorcees. This has caused “great discomfort” to “many bishops and parish priests” because of an “unstable and confused pastoral situation,” he said.
To remedy the situation, Msgr. Bux, a former consultor to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under Benedict XVI, still believes some kind of profession of faith is required of the Pope. He referred to a similar profession St. Paul VI made in 1968 that reaffirmed what is Catholic “in the face of the errors and heresies” that came immediately after the Second Vatican Council.
“If this doesn’t happen,” he warned, “the apostasy will deepen and the de facto schism will widen.”
Who Has Erred?
Msgr. Bux feels the situation has become especially urgent after the Pope changed the Catechism in August to declare the death penalty “inadmissible.” The change contradicts the Tridentine and St. Pius X Catechisms, the theologian asserted, the latter of which taught that the legitimacy of capital punishment was in “full conformity with Divine Revelation.”
“Either one admits that the Church has taught the legitimacy of something not conforming to the Gospel practically for two thousand years, or one must admit that it was Pope Bergoglio who erred,” Msgr. Bux said, adding: “This is a very sensitive issue, but sooner or later he’s going have to put this right. And not just for the death penalty.”
Asked by Valli if this sets a precedent for the Pope to change more of the Catechism if he wishes, the theologian said this is a “very disturbing question,” and that another “legitimate concern” is to keep the deposit of faith from “sensitivities contingent on today’s or tomorrow’s society.”
The Pope cannot “impose his own opinion” on the Church, Msgr. Bux stressed, quoting Joseph Ratzinger, because on matters of faith, morals and the sacraments, the Church can “only consent to the will of Christ.” And yet he said “many points” in Amoris Laetitia are “cumbersome and contradictory” as well as contrary to the thinking of St. Thomas Aquinas, despite the exhortation asserting otherwise.
He also pointed out that the tendency of this pontificate to be silent in the face of criticism, or refuse to engage the charges of heresy or apostasy, bring to mind St. Pius X’s warning in his 1907 encyclical Pascendi dominici gregis: That never “clearly confessing one’s own heresy” is “typical behaviour of the modernists, because in this way they can hide themselves within the Church.”
Valli and Msgr. Bux then went on to discuss the practical, theological and juridical difficulties of correcting a pope of such errors. These include the hurdle that heresy must be “manifest and public,” that the Pope must be fully conscious of having voluntarily questioned a truth of the faith, and that he also has a “kind of immunity from jurisdiction” due to the canonical principle that no one can judge the Apostolic See and “even less” can they “judge their shepherd.”
Unreliable Theology
A further difficulty today, he said, is “identifying the exact contours of a heresy” because theology “is no longer reliable.” Instead, he said it has become a “sort of arena” where a truth is affirmed, but someone else is always “willing to defend the exact opposite.”
“More useful” than a fraternal correction, he said, would be to examine the “juridical validity” of Pope Benedict’s XVI’s resignation and “whether it is full or partial.” Jesus, he said, did not give the keys of heaven to Peter and Andrew but “said it only to Peter.” Such an “in-depth study” of the resignation, he said, could help to “overcome problems that today seem insurmountable to us.”
“Great change” in the Church is “palpable” under Pope Francis, Msgr. Bux said, along with a “clear intention to mark a line of discontinuity, or break, with previous pontificates.” Such a rupture, he went on to say, is a “revolution” that “generates heresies, schisms, and controversies of various kinds” and “all of them can be traced back to sin.”
...
D Nicola Bux está muito generoso...
ResponderExcluirSe se ajuntarem certas palavras e textos do papa Francisco a supostas heresias e blasfemias proferidas, chegaria-se à conclusão que o cisma teria já sido instalado, se o seguíssemos à risca, estaríamos incorrendo em possíveis heresias e/ou em blasfemias; recorde só uma delas, bem esquecida:
... En efecto, en la audiencia del 17 de marzo de 2017 a los miembros del CTEWC (Catholic Theological Ethics in the World Church), para seguir siendo fiel al método de hablar improvisadamente, ha saltado diciendo que “En la Santísima Trinidad, ellas (las tres Personas divinas) pasan el tiempo discutiendo a puerta cerrada, pero al exterior dan una imagen de unidad”.
https://adelantelafe.com/cambian-los-tiempos-cambiese-a-dios/
Digo mais uma vez: o Papa Francisco é um dos piores papas na história da Igreja Católica.
ResponderExcluirTristemente, a realidade é esta. :(
Bom dia!!! Aconselho a lerem o Catecismo Maior de São Pio X e o Catecismo da Crise da Igreja Catolica. Por fim estudem D. Marcel Lefebvre, e seus escritos, e a FSSPX.
ResponderExcluir