Documentário: A Invasão Global do Radicalismo Islâmico.

O documentário acima trata de como a imigração é um método islâmico para dominar os países ocidentais.

Na semana passada, a primeira-ministra da Alemanha admitiu que entre os refugiados admitidos na Alemanha há muitos terroristas.

Mas o problema não é apenas que o terrorista islâmico esteja entrando como imigrante, o problema é a ideologia de morte islâmica, que pode dominar não só os imigrantes, como qualquer um.

O problema não são apenas os terroristas islâmicos, o problema é o forte impacto cultural em um país europeu.

Como eu costumo dizer, para se vencer o terrorismo islâmico deve-se usar duas armas.1) Armas tradicionais contra aqueles que querem matar; e 2) Armas culturais, é preciso colocar o Alcorão debaixo do sol e ver o que este livro mostra. Daí, negá-lo na sociedade. Sem essas duas armas, não é possível vencer o terrorismo islâmico.

Discuto no meu livro sobre Guerra Justa, como o Papa Francisco está historicamente e teologicamente equivocado ao defender a imigração em massa e ao dizer que Islã é religião de paz. No meu livro, eu não trato de imigração, não é esse o foco do livro. Mas discuto o efeito da chamada "Primavera Árabe" na imigração para a Europa.

O controle de imigração é saudável, pois a imigração em massa é terrível contra a cultura de um povo.

Hoje li que a candidata Marine Le Pen da França está furiosa contra o Papa Francisco por ele defender a imigração se esquecendo, não apenas do impacto cultural, como também do custo financeiro disso na sociedade.

Turcos na Alemanha e na França Dizem Não para Democracia

Os bens materiais, o conhecimento da democracia e da diversidade cultural não ensinaram nada aos turcos que moram na Alemanha, na França, na Áustria e na Bélgica.

A população de origem turca que vive na Europa, vive principalmente na Alemanha e na França, muito especialmente na Alemanha, onde uma partida de futebol entre Alemanha e Turquia terá o estádio com maioria turca. A Alemanha é o país mais rico da Europa, onde há melhores chances de se conseguir um emprego bom e há muitas chances de apoio do governo. País para onde correm milhões de imigrantes.

Na votação de domingo, 63,07% dos turcos morando na Alemanha decidiram apoiar o ditador Recep Erdogan, dando mais poderes a ele e chance dele ficar no poder até 2029. Na França, um proporção ainda maior de turcos apoiou Endorgan (64,85%), na Áustria alcançou 73,23% e foi recorde na Bélgica (74,89%).  Eles deram o YES para o ditador Erdogan.

Se os bens materiais, a democracia ocidental e o politicamente correto não ensinaram nada aos turcos vivendo na Europa, o que os manteve pró-ditadura?

Será o Islã?

Bem, provável. O Islã não reconhece a democracia.

O site Wikipedia traz a descrição da distribuição dos votos.

O New York Times relatou que um advogado alemão reclamou que turcos vivendo na Alemanha deveriam ter votado pela democracia na Turquia. O líder do Partido Verde na Alemanha ao ver o resultado que apoia a ditadura disse que o culpado era a "falha na integração". Sempre a mesma desculpa.

Vejam abaixo:

A leading German lawmaker has called on Turkish immigrants to show more commitment to Germany's democratic values after a clear majority of the 1.4 million Turkish immigrants who were eligible to vote in the Turkish referendum cast their ballot in favor of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

According to state-run Anadolu Agency, 63.07 percent of the Turks in Germany voted in favor of Erdogan's plans to greatly expand the powers of his office.

Cem Ozdemir, one of the heads of the Green Party and a son of Turkish immigrants himself, told German news agency dpa on Monday the strong support for Erdogan was also the result of decades of failed integration policies in Germany, which as a society never gave Turks a sense of fully belonging.

Vídeo: Qual é a Data Exata da Crucificação de Jesus Cristo

O vídeo acima é do Dr. Taylor Marshall, do New Saint Thomas Institute (NSTI). Eu, durante três anos, fui aluno do Dr. Marshall e de seu fantástico instituto. Tenho dois certificados desse Instituto.

No vídeo acima, ele mostra uma aula sua no NSTI sobre a data exata da cruficação de Jesus Cristo, usando a Bíblia e dados astronômicos.

Não tenho tempo para traduzir o vídeo, mas aqui vão os 9 pontos que Marshall mostra e que estabelecem a data exata.

1) Lucas 3:1, diz que João Batista começou seu ministério no décimo-quinto ano de governo do imperador romano Tibério Cesar;

2) Tibério Cesar substituiu o imperador Augusto Cesar no dia 19 de agosto do ano 14. E governou até o ano de 37. Então, João Batista começou seu ministério entre os anos 28 e 29;

3) Dessa forma, Jesus Cristo foi batizado por João Batista entre os anos 29 e 30;

4) O ministério de Jesus se estendeu de 3 a 3 anos e meio. O Evangelho de São João diz que Cristo, durante seu ministério, passou por pelo menos três celebrações de Páscoa e no máximo quatro:

1. João 2:13,23;
2. João 6:4;
3. João 11:55 e 12:1

5) Isso coloca a morte de Cristo por volta dos anos 33 e 34;

6) Todos os quatro evangelistas dizem que a crucificação de Cristo começou poucas horas antes do início do dia sabbath judeu, que é observado do pôr do sol da sexta-feira até o por do sol do sábado. Esse dia é celebrado na Páscoa com a presença da lua cheia.

7) Com ajuda de computadores astronômicos, podemos saber com certeza como estava o céu em qualquer período. Assim, é possível procurar uma sexta-feira com lua cheia entre os anos 30 a 34. 

Há apenas duas datas possíveis:

- 7 de abril de 30
- 3 de abril de 33.

Pelas informações anteriores, a única data possível é 3 de abril de 33.

8) Assim, o batismo de Cristo deve ter sido no início do ano 30 ( a Igreja marca a epifania para​ dia 6 de janeiro) e a ressurreição ocorreu no dia 5 de abril de 33.

9) Os judeus consideravam que o dia começava no por do sol. Assim, quinta-feira santa à noite já era a sexta da Páscoa.

Padre Samir: "Papa Francisco Deveria Dizer a Verdade sobre o Islã"

Eu já falei aqui algumas vezes do Padre Samir Khalil Samir, também mencionei o padre no meu livro de Guerra Justa. Ele é um padre egípcio, que é autoridade em Islã.

Ele deu uma entrevista ao National Catholic Register,  sobre a próxima visita do Papa Francisco ao Egito, após os ataques terroristas a duas igrejas cristãs.

Padre Samir foi claro, disse:

- "O Islã não é religião de paz";

- "O Estado Islâmico só faz o que o Islã sempre fez ao seguir o Alcorão e Maomé", e que o

- "Papa Francisco deveria dizer a verdade sobre o Islã no Egito".

A entrevista é sensacional sob vários aspectos.

Vejam parte da entrevista feita pelo National Catholic Register.

Father Samir: Egypt’s Palm Sunday Terror Reflects a Sickness Within Islam

Posted by Edward Pentin on Thursday Apr 13th, 2017 at 11:45 AM

The Egyptian priest, who is an authority on Islam, discusses the factors driving the murderous attacks on Christians and what he hopes the Pope will say when he visits Egypt this month.

VATICAN CITY — Oil money, Wahhabi extremism and an Islam unwilling to reform itself are the principal reasons for the terrorist attacks on two Egyptian churches on Palm Sunday and the rise of Islamism over the past 100 years.
This is according to Jesuit Father Samir Khalil Samir, professor of Islamic studies at the Pontifical Oriental Institute in Rome, who says it is false when people say such attacks have nothing to do with Islam. “ISIS is not doing anything which is neither in the Quran nor in the Mohammedan tradition,” he says.
In this April 10 interview with the Register, Father Samir — who is Egyptian himself — discusses the main motivations behind Islamic violence, why it’s important to say exactly how things are within Islam and help reform it, and his hopes for Pope Francis’ April 28-29 visit to Egypt.

What are the primary causes of these attacks? What’s behind them? Is it primarily to do with Islam, politics or something else?
For a year or more, the Muslim Brotherhood were attacking regularly during the presidency of Mohamed Morsi (2012-2013); they were attacking Christians, for any reason. For instance, they alleged a Christian who was building a house for his two children was in fact not building a house, but a church, so they are trying to make problems for the Christians. This happens regularly, but it became much more intense.
Now this time, what we hear from Egypt is that ISIS is saying they are behind these attacks, but there’s also support from the Muslim Brotherhood because they were ejected from the political system. The feeling is that the attacks against Christians in Egypt are becoming more frequent and violent. This has never happened before, that they attack so many churches and precisely on such a great Christian feast. The last ones took place before Christmas, and now these two attacks during Holy Week. The intent is probably to attack the president indirectly, through the Christians, to say he’s not able to govern or control the situation. In north Sinai, they attacked Christians and so the government moved them. Now they’ve come back under the protection of the army. In the past month, we’ve had three big attacks, and four months ago we had the attack near the Coptic cathedral.

Is attacking Christians, therefore, really about attracting negative attention against the government more than it is against Christians per se?
It’s both because they attack Christians without reason, in different situations — this year, last year and so on. Christians and Jews are their enemies, but there are no more Jews in Egypt. Christians are 10% of the population, 9 million people. So this Islamic movement, for six years now, has simply wanted to create a new caliphate, by all means possible, because there’s a great crisis within the Islamic world, and the crisis is turning into violence.

What is precipitating this crisis?
In Islam they are not prepared nor able to renew themselves, as [Egypt’s] President [Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil] el-Sisi said in December 2014 when he took power. He spoke to Al-Azhar University and gave a beautiful speech, in which he said we need to make a revolution in Islam, to rethink the whole system. The scholars all applauded, said, “Yes, Yes,” but they haven’t changed anything in the teaching. Many intellectuals on Egyptian television came and developed this argument and said Al-Azhar is unable to make the reform we need. Nothing has changed.

Are you of the view that Islamism is the true Islam?
ISIS is the application of what is taught. It’s not outside Islam, or something invented. No, they are applying Islam. When we hear it has nothing to do with Islam — that it means salaam; that it means peace — this is all false. It’s not true. ISIS is not doing anything which is neither in the Quran nor in the Mohammedan tradition. Everything is taken after a decision taken by an imam. A mufti and imam will say this is or is not allowed.
This isn’t just a problem in Egypt, but Egypt represents the greatest and strongest country, and also where you have the most important school of Islamic learning — just as we have Rome for the Catholic Church, Islam has Al-Azhar University.

Given this fact, what do you think about the Pope’s visit to Cairo? Should he say this hard truth about Islam, but in a diplomatic way?
Yes. He should certainly be very diplomatic. He wants to be more than diplomatic, to foster good relations with them, this is sure. He is avoiding hard words. He never said Islam is also a religion of violence — he said the opposite. He said there’s no violence in religion and so on, because this is his aim: to help Muslims, who are the second-most important group in the world, to have a dialogue and understanding.

Is that an acceptable way of approaching the issue, in your view?
Well, it’s not my way. I think it’s important to say things with charity, with friendship, but to say things as they are: that it cannot continue like this; we have to rethink Islam. This is my vision. They cannot take the texts of the seventh century literally as they are in the Quran. He [the Pope] does not dare to say something like that because he doesn’t know the Quran well enough, and so on. So I understand his position, but it would be better to have a clearer and more frank discussion — with openness, but also with some realism.

The Pope called for the hearts of the terrorists to be converted and for the conversion of the hearts of those who traffic weapons. Is that a fair point, or is that not going to the root cause?
Certainly, in Egypt everyone says the whole structure of ISIS is something elaborated by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the Wahhabi countries, against the Shia. It’s also my opinion. What does ISIS mean? It’s “Islamic State for Iraq and Syria.” This is the name they have chosen, taken from the Arabic Daesh, which means exactly that.
Now why Iraq and Syria? Because in Iraq we have a Shia government after the death of Saddam Hussein. The U.S.A. organized the country like that; they said the Shia are a small majority so the government should be led by Shia, with Sunni. In Syria the government is Alawite, which is a branch of Shia, although they are at most 15% of the population. This has been the case for 50 years now, with the father, Hafez al-Assad, and now his son, Bashar al-Assad. So the Sunni — who are 70%-75% — organized the protest against the government because they want to take power.
The question is religious, too, and supported by the rich countries of Arabia. And the rich buy the weapons from the U.S. principally, but also England, France, Italy and Germany to a smaller degree. So there is in fact an international war going on, but it is not clear. It seems to be they’re using this revolutionary Islamic State, which was partly formed by the U.S., from Iraq, after the occupation of Iraq, after the death of Saddam Hussein, because the U.S. formed a group of well-trained military. The so-called caliph, Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi, was one of these people trained by the U.S.
So all the conditions were there, but no one was thinking it would be so savage, that it would be absolutely inhuman. They killed and tortured people; they took women and people as slaves and turned children into bombs.

This was unprecedented?
We had never seen something like that, so the reaction of official Islam is that this has nothing to do with Islam, but this is in fact a lie. It has 100% to do with Islam, with chosen texts from the Quran and sharia [Islamic law]. They’re not doing anything against Islamic law.

How much is Islamism primarily due to Islam rather than, perhaps, Arab culture? Why, for instance, does Islamism appear much less prominent in Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim country, than in the Middle East? 
Everything comes from the Middle East in Islam, this is sure, but, unfortunately, even in Indonesia, where there are 220 million people, they are now no longer as they were 15 years ago. There was a Protestant who was elected to parliament, and they wanted to put him in prison simply because he said something against Muhammad. This was once unthinkable in Indonesia.
Then you have Pakistan and Bangladesh, which are much worse than what we see in the Arab world. The propaganda coming from the Wahhabi countries is organized to go everywhere — to Asia and Africa. You have Boko Haram [in Nigeria] and others in Sudan. This is the general movement of this Wahhabi thinking and for the imams. It’s organized by Al-Azhar, whether they want it to be or not.

Do you think Al-Azhar is also partly responsible for Islamism?
I don’t think Al-Azhar has wanted to create something like that, but the teaching they are giving, as a consequence, is a radical Islam. President el-Sisi some weeks ago proposed that, from now on, a man is not allowed to say to his wife: “You are repudiated” (I divorce you). The repudiation by words, as it is practiced today, means you just had to say three times you are repudiated in the presence of two Muslim men. He said no, from now on, all should go through a tribunal, but Al-Azhar refused with the argument that this was already in force in the time of Muhammad and we cannot touch it.
So the conflict is within Islam, and the solution is within Islam. We have to reform Islam and our understanding of Islam.

Possível Milagre: Hóstia Sangrando na Argentina Nesta Semana Santa.

O site Catholic News relata a ocorrência de um possível milagre em hóstia durante adoração ocorrida em um centro de reabilitação para drogados na Argentina, província de Santa Fé.

A hóstia começou a sangrar durante a adoração no dia 11 abril desta semana de Páscoa.

O nome da província é sugestivo e o nome do centro de reabilitação também, chama-se São Miguel.

Que São Miguel nos proteja e guie a Igreja a Cristo.

O bispo iniciou processo de investigação.

Vejam relato do fato clicando aqui.

Feliz Páscoa em Cristo a todos os amigos do blog. Que Cristo nos abençoe. Rezemos.

MIT Publica Livro de Comunismo para Crianças. Comunismo Seria Maravilhoso

Eu tenho planos de escrever livros para crianças, mas tenho certeza que não tenho nenhuma chance de ser publicado pelo MIT.

Esse é o "grande" MIT, que supostamente é a universidade que é bastião do pensamento científico e defensora da liberdade de pensamento. Mas não deve ter professores de história por lá, no entanto, pois o MIT não sabe o que ocorreu e ocorre em países comunistas e afins, tipo milhões de mortes e destruição da democracia.

Segundo várias reportagens sobre o livro do comunismo para crianças, o autor pinta um comunismo como uma ideia linda, mas que não foi bem implementada, e que é possível um comunismo sem autoritarismo, prometendo livrar o mundo da "miséria do capitalismo".

O autor chama as crianças de "adoráveis pequenos revolucionários". Essas palavras caberiam bem na boca do demônio. 

O autor diz que costuma escrever sobre "queer politics" (política para gays). Ele também deve querer ensinar as crianças sobre sexo. 

O autor, que eu não sei quem é, nem me interessa em saber, é um alemão. De onde mais, não é? País de Karl Marx, Rosa Luxemburgo, e da Escola de Frankfurt. E também país de Lutero, que é pai de todos eles.

Vocês podem ler sobre isso aqui, aqui, aqui e aqui.

Livro: Como Manter a Imaginação de Seus Filhos

Aqui vai uma indicação de um livro para pais e mães. O livro é do brilhante filósofo Anthony Esolen. Ele conhece muito bem como vai a educação de crianças no mundo de hoje e como essa edução prejudica a formação de um adulto. Ele relatou 10 maneiras que essa educação usa para destruir a imaginação das crianças e apontou as soluções para isso.

A livro foi publicado no Brasil pela Vide Editorial, que é a mesma editora que publicou meu livro sobre Guerra Justa.

No site da Editora  Vide Editorial há uma descrição do livro de Esolen. Vejamos abaixo:

O professor Anthony Esolen demonstra neste livro por que o modelo de educação infantil contemporâneo não só é ineficiente na criação de um adulto maduro, como é nocivo às faculdades mentais da criança, especialmente à imaginação.

Mais do que um diagnóstico assombrosamente preciso dos desastres pedagógicos implementados sistematicamente ao longo das últimas décadas (não só nos EUA), o autor ainda indica o que eles têm em comum — em suma, o ataque à faculdade imaginativa da criança — e os procedimentos para reverter o quadro. 

Para quem quer que deseje saber como não criar os seus filhos, esta leitura é urgente.

O site da Amazon traz a descrição para a versão em inglês do livro, vejamos abaixo:

“Esolen signals with this book his presence in the top rank of authors of cultural criticism.” —American Spectator

Play dates, soccer practice, day care, political correctness, drudgery without facts, television, video games, constant supervision, endless distractions: these and other insidious trends in child rearing and education are now the hallmarks of childhood. As author Anthony Esolen demonstrates in this elegantly written, often wickedly funny book, almost everything we are doing to children now constricts their imaginations, usually to serve the ulterior motives of the constrictors.

Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child takes square aim at these accelerating trends, in a bitingly witty style reminiscent of C. S. Lewis, while offering parents—and children—hopeful alternatives. Esolen shows how imagination is snuffed out at practically every turn: in the rearing of children almost exclusively indoors; in the flattening of love to sex education, and sex education to prurience and hygiene; in the loss of traditional childhood games; in the refusal to allow children to organize themselves into teams; in the effacing of the glorious differences between the sexes; in the dismissal of the power of memory, which creates the worst of all possible worlds in school—drudgery without even the merit of imparting facts; in the strict separation of the child’s world from the adult’s; and in the denial of the transcendent, which places a low ceiling on the child’s developing spirit and mind.

But Esolen doesn’t stop at pointing out the problem; he offers clear solutions as well. With charming stories from his own boyhood and an assist from the master authors and thinkers of the Western tradition, Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child is a welcome respite from the overwhelming banality of contemporary culture. Interwoven throughout this indispensable guide to child rearing is a rich tapestry of the literature, music, art, and thought that once enriched the lives of American children.

Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child confronts contemporary trends in parenting and schooling by reclaiming lost traditions. This practical, insightful book is essential reading for any parent who cares about the paltry thing that childhood has become, and who wants to give a child something beyond the dull drone of today’s culture.

Terrorista da Suécia Mirou em Quem o Ajudava.

A primeira vítima do ataque terrorista da Suécia, aquela que o caminhão atacou frontalmente e matou na hora, era uma psicóloga da Bélgica, mãe de uma criança de 18 meses, que ajudava os refugiados muçulmanos a ficar na Europa. Ela trabalhava especialmente nos presídios, para ajudar os muçulmanos.

O terrorista que a matou é um refugiado que enfrentava processo de deportação, exatamente o tipo de pessoa que ela ajudava.

A Suécia não quer saber das vítimas, após o atentado a promessa do governo é evitar "discurso de ódio", epserando as próximas vítimas.

Vejam o relato do site Breibart.

Stockholm Attack Victim Was Psychiatrist ‘Committed to Helping Asylum Seekers’ Facing Deportation

A Belgian psychologist and mother to an 18-month-old son, who worked with asylum seekers facing deportation, has been named as the first victim of last week’s terror attack in Stockholm.

Maïlys Dereymaeker, 31, had been waiting for friends on Friday afternoon when failed asylum seeker Rakhmat Akhmat Akilov ploughed a truck into crowds in what is thought to be an Islamic State-inspired terrorist attack.

A keen musician from the small town of Lembeek near Brussels, Belgium, Dereymaeker was the first to be hit by the vehicle and died instantly at the scene, local media reports.

The mother-of-one was “very committed to helping asylum seekers” according to daily newspaper La Dernière Heure. A former psychologist, working in detention centres for Belgium’s Immigration Office, Dereymaeker often helped illegal immigrants like her alleged killer whose asylum claim was rejected in Sweden last year.

Belgium’s Het Nieuwsblad reports that Dereymaeker was “always seeking meetings” with illegal migrants in detention, stating a desire to understand them better and to “build bridges”.

“It’s difficult for me to talk about her death,” a friend told local media. “She played the flute and taught music to children.”

Members of the orchestra were distraught at the news of her death, describing the 31-year-old as “really positive about life” and telling media that she was “always smiling”.

Police chief Erik Nord called for Sweden to deport migrants who vocalise support for “violent extremism” when it emerged that the perpetrator of the deadly truck attack had posted Islamic State propaganda on Facebook and ‘liked’ pictures of casualties after the terrorist attack on the Boston Marathon in 2013.

But Justice Minister Morgan Johansson slapped down the suggestion and demanded the police chief “explain himself”.

Defending the right of extremists to stay in Sweden, the Social Democratic party politician pointed to the nation’s “freedom of speech”, but added that this doesn’t include “hate speech”.

Johansson also warned that migrants could risk “persecution” in their homelands, if they were deported.