segunda-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2017

Dois Vídeos para Papa Francisco. Vídeos de Pessoas que Conhecem o Islã de Perto.



No meu post anterior, eu menciono que o Papa Francisco rasgou meio Velho Testamento e muitas publicações e palavras de diversos santos católicos ilustres, como São Francisco de Assis e São Tomás de Aquino, ao dizer que "não existe povo criminoso" e que "não existe terrorismo islâmico".

Trago hoje dois vídeos, de pessoas que nasceram dentro do mundo islâmico. Eles explicam Islã. O Papa Francisco seria bem mais útil, em suas palavras sobre o Islã, se levasse em consideração o que se fala nesses dois vídeos.

O primeiro, acima, é de Ayan Hirsi Ali. Ela detona a visão esquerdista sobre Islã, que é defendida pelo Papa Francisco.

O segundo, abaixo, é do grande especialista em Islã, o egípcio Raymond Ibrahim. Ele mostra a perseguição a cristãos pelo Islã.

Os dois vídeos têm legenda em português.




No meu post abaixo, eu menciono meu livro, que tratou sobre Guerra Justa. Nele trago a opinião sobre o Islã de de santos, teólogos cristãos, papas e até escritores cristãos. Mas por se tratar de um livro sobre Guerra Justa, que é uma doutrina cristã, eu não entrei no debate sobre o Islã que surge dentro dos próprios muçulmanos. Mas se fosse o caso, em livro sobre o próprio Islã, com certeza Ayan Hirsi Ali e Raymond Ibrahim seriam citados, além dos mencionados no vídeo Tawfiw Hamid, Asra Nomani e Zuhdi Jasser.

Aliás a única coisa que discordo do vídeo de Ayan Ali é quando ela diz que o Ocidente defendeu os dissidentes do comunismo. Eu acho que não. Esses dissidentes também foram renegados na mídia global. Apenas alguns conheciam seus nomes. Por exemplo, eu que estudei quando ainda existia o mundo soviético, nunca tive nenhum professor que mencionasse esses dissidentes, nem nunca li nenhum jornal impresso ou televisivo na época ressaltando a luta deles.

Assistam aos vídeos. Aprendam com quem conhece o Islã desde que nasceu.



sexta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2017

Papa Francisco: "Não Existe Terrorismo Islâmico, Porque Nenhuma Religião é Terrorista e Nenhum Povo é Criminoso"


Papa Francisco fez um discurso hoje para uma Reunião de Movimentos Populares. Na oportunidade, ele disse que não existe terrorismo islâmico porque nenhuma religião é terrorista. Também não existe povo criminoso.

Com essa argumentação, eu diria que ele rasgou boa parte do Antigo Testamento, que é pleno de povos criminosos, e rasgou o que disseram inúmeros santos sobre o Islã, desde São João Damasceno, que viu o Islã nascer. 

No meu livro, eu falei dos sete povos que Deus condenou no Antigo Testamento, além de um povo chamado Amalec, que perseguiu Israel.

Como diz Deuterônimo 7:1-2:

"Quando Iahweh teu Deus te houver introduzido na terra em que estás entrando para possuí-la, e expulsado nações mais numerosas do que tu — os heteus, os gergeseus, os amorreus, os cananeus, os ferezeus, os heveus e os jebuseus —, sete nações mais numerosas e poderosas do que tu; quando Iahweh teu Deus entregá-las a ti, tu as derrotarás e as sacrificarás como anátema.”.

E sobre os Amalec (1 Samuel 15:1-3):

“Resolvi punir o que Amalec fez a Israel cortando-lhe o caminho quando subia do Egito. Vai, pois, agora, e investe contra Amalec, condena-o ao anátema com tudo o que lhe pertence, não tenhas piedade dele, mata homens e mulheres, crianças e recém-nascidos, bois e ovelhas, camelos e jumentos."

Sobre o que disseram os santos sobre o Islã, ver no meu livro, hehe, são tantos, como São Francisco de Assis, São Tomás de Aquino e também tem padres, bispos e arcebispos dos nossos dias. Comprem o livro, clicando aqui, e enviem suas questões e críticas que responderei com prazer e carinho.

Abaixo, vai discurso do Papa Francisco, no qual ele defende coisas estranhas à Bíblia e a Doutrina da Igreja em matéria de crime. Para o Papa, o crime parece surgir apenas das desigualdades sociais (um discurso bem marxista) e não do que "está no coração dos homens", como disse Cristo:

Pope Francis: No people is criminal and no religion is terrorist

2017-02-17
FULL TEXT

MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS
ON THE OCCASION OF THE WORLD MEETINGS OF POPULAR MOVEMENTS 
IN MODESTO (CALIFORNIA) 16-18 FEBRUARY 2017


Dear Brothers and Sisters,

First of all, I would like to congratulate you for your effort in replicating on a national level the work being developed in the World Meetings of Popular Movements. By way of this letter, I want to encourage and strengthen each one of you, your organizations, and all who strive with you for "Land, Work and Housing,” the three T’s in Spanish: Tierra, Trabajo y Techo. I congratulate you for all that you are doing.

I would like to thank the Catholic Campaign for Human Development, its chairman Bishop David Talley, and the host Bishops Stephen Blaire, Armando Ochoa and Jaime Soto, for the wholehearted support they have offered to this meeting. Thank you, Cardinal Peter Turkson, for your continued support of popular movements from the new Dicastery for the Promotion of Integral Human Development. It makes me very happy to see you working together towards social justice! How I wish that such constructive energy would spread to all dioceses, because it builds bridges between peoples and individuals. These are bridges that can overcome the walls of exclusion, indifference, racism, and intolerance.

I would also like to highlight the work done by the PICO National Network and the organizations promoting this meeting. I learned that PICO stands for "People Improving Communities through Organizing”. What a great synthesis of the mission of popular movements: to work locally, side by side with your neighbors, organizing among yourselves, to make your communities thrive.

A few months ago in Rome, we talked at the third World Meeting of Popular Movements about walls and fear, about bridges and love.[1] Without wanting to repeat myself, these issues do challenge our deepest values.

We know that none of these ills began yesterday. For some time, the crisis of the prevailing paradigm has confronted us. I am speaking of a system that causes enormous suffering to the human family, simultaneously assaulting people’s dignity and our Common Home in order to sustain the invisible tyranny of money that only guarantees the privileges of a few. "In our time humanity is experiencing a turning-point in its history.”[2]

As Christians and all people of good will, it is for us to live and act at this moment. It is "a grave responsibility, since certain present realities, unless effectively dealt with, are capable of setting off processes of dehumanization which would then be hard to reverse.”[3] These are signs of the times that we need to recognize in order to act. We have lost valuable time: time when we did not pay enough attention to these processes, time when we did not resolve these destructive realities. Thus the processes of dehumanization accelerate. The direction taken beyond this historic turning-point—the ways in which this worsening crisis gets resolved—will depend on people’s involvement and participation and, largely, on yourselves, the popular movements.

We should be neither paralyzed by fear nor shackled within the conflict. We have to acknowledge the danger but also the opportunity that every crisis brings in order to advance to a successful synthesis. In the Chinese language, which expresses the ancestral wisdom of that great people, the word "crisis” is comprised of two ideograms: Wi, which represents "danger”, and J, which represents "opportunity”.

The grave danger is to disown our neighbors. When we do so, we deny their humanity and our own humanity without realizing it; we deny ourselves, and we deny the most important Commandments of Jesus. Herein lies the danger, the dehumanization. But here we also find an opportunity: that the light of the love of neighbor may illuminate the Earth with its stunning brightness like a lightning bolt in the dark; that it may wake us up and let true humanity burst through with authentic resistance, resilience and persistence.

The question that the lawyer asked Jesus in the Gospel of Luke (10:25-37) echoes in our ears today: "Who is my neighbor?” Who is that other whom we are to love as we love ourselves? Maybe the questioner expects a comfortable response in order to carry on with his life: "My relatives? My compatriots? My co-religionists? ...” Maybe he wants Jesus to excuse us from the obligation of loving pagans or foreigners who at that time were considered unclean. This man wants a clear rule that allows him to classify others as "neighbor” and "non-neighbor”, as those who can become neighbors and those who cannot become neighbors.[4]

Jesus responds with a parable which features two figures belonging to the elite of the day and a third figure, considered a foreigner, a pagan and unclean: the Samaritan. On the road from Jerusalem to Jericho, the priest and the Levite come upon a dying man, whom robbers have attacked, stripped and abandoned. In such situations the Law of the Lord imposes the duty to offer assistance, but both pass by without stopping. They were in a hurry. However, unlike these elite figures, the Samaritan stopped. Why him? As a Samaritan he was looked down upon, no one would have counted on him, and in any case he would have had his own commitments and things to do—yet when he saw the injured man, he did not pass by like the other two who were linked to the Temple, but "he saw him and had compassion on him” (v. 33). The Samaritan acts with true mercy: he binds up the man's wounds, transports him to an inn, personally takes care of him, and provides for his upkeep. All this teaches us that compassion, love, is not a vague sentiment, but rather means taking care of the other to the point of personally paying for him. It means committing oneself to take all the necessary steps so as to "draw near to” the other to the point of identifying with him: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” This is the Lord’s Commandment.[5]

The economic system that has the god of money at its center, and that sometimes acts with the brutality of the robbers in the parable, inflicts injuries that to a criminal degree have remained neglected. Globalized society frequently looks the other way with the pretence of innocence. Under the guise of what is politically correct or ideologically fashionable, one looks at those who suffer without touching them. But they are televised live; they are talked about in euphemisms and with apparent tolerance, but nothing is done systematically to heal the social wounds or to confront the structures that leave so many brothers and sisters by the wayside. This hypocritical attitude, so different from that of the Samaritan, manifests an absence of true commitment to humanity.

Sooner or later, the moral blindness of this indifference comes to light, like when a mirage dissipates. The wounds are there, they are a reality. The unemployment is real, the violence is real, the corruption is real, the identity crisis is real, the gutting of democracies is real. The system’s gangrene cannot be whitewashed forever because sooner or later the stench becomes too strong; and when it can no longer be denied, the same power that spawned this state of affairs sets about manipulating fear, insecurity, quarrels, and even people’s justified indignation, in order to shift the responsibility for all these ills onto a "non-neighbor”. I am not speaking of anyone in particular, I am speaking of a social and political process that flourishes in many parts of the world and poses a grave danger for humanity.

Jesus teaches us a different path. Do not classify others in order to see who is a neighbor and who is not. You can become neighbor to whomever you meet in need, and you will do so if you have compassion in your heart. That is to say, if you have that capacity to suffer with someone else. You must become a Samaritan. And then also become like the innkeeper at the end of the parable to whom the Samaritan entrusts the person who is suffering. Who is this innkeeper? It is the Church, the Christian community, people of compassion and solidarity, social organizations. It is us, it is you, to whom the Lord Jesus daily entrusts those who are afflicted in body and spirit, so that we can continue pouring out all of his immeasurable mercy and salvation upon them. Here are the roots of the authentic humanity that resists the dehumanization that wears the livery of indifference, hypocrisy, or intolerance.

I know that you have committed yourselves to fight for social justice, to defend our Sister Mother Earth and to stand alongside migrants. I want to reaffirm your choice and share two reflections in this regard.

First, the ecological crisis is real. "A very solid scientific consensus indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system.”[6] Science is not the only form of knowledge, it is true. It is also true that science is not necessarily "neutral”—many times it conceals ideological views or economic interests. However, we also know what happens when we deny science and disregard the voice of Nature. I make my own everything that concerns us as Catholics. Let us not fall into denial. Time is running out. Let us act. I ask you again—all of you, people of all backgrounds including native people, pastors, political leaders—to defend Creation.

The other is a reflection that I shared at our most recent World Meeting of Popular Movements, and I feel is important to say it again: no people is criminal and no religion is terrorist. Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. They do not exist. No people is criminal or drug-trafficking or violent. "The poor and the poorer peoples are accused of violence yet, without equal opportunities, the different forms of aggression and conflict will find a fertile terrain for growth and will eventually explode.”[7] There are fundamentalist and violent individuals in all peoples and religions—and with intolerant generalizations they become stronger because they feed on hate and xenophobia. By confronting terror with love, we work for peace.

I ask you for meekness and resolve to defend these principles. I ask you not to barter them lightly or apply them superficially. Like Saint Francis of Assisi, let us give everything of ourselves: where there is hatred, let us sow love; where there is injury, let us sow pardon; where there is discord, let us sow unity; where there is error, let us sow truth.[8]

Please know that I pray for you, that I pray with you, and I ask God our Father to accompany and bless you. May He shower you with his love and protect you. I ask you to please pray for me too, and to carry on.

Vatican City, 10 February 2017

[1] Address to the 3rd World Meeting of Popular Movements, Paul VI Audience Hall, 5 November 2016.
[2] Evangelii Gaudium §52

[3] Ibid. §51

[4] Cf. General Audience, 27 April 2016.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Laudato Si’ §23

[7] Evangelii Gaudium §59

[8] Cf. St Francis of Assisi, Peace Prayer.

quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2017

A Guerra Civil no Vaticano. Papa Francisco e os Seus vs Doutrina Secular da Igreja


Hoje li dois artigos que dão conta de uma guerra civil no Vaticano em disputa que envolve a doutrina secular da Igreja, em especial, em relação ao principal sacramento da Igreja: a Eucaristia.

O Papa Francisco, seguramente, está entre aqueles que querem mudar a doutrina secular (e que foi determinada pelo próprio Cristo) em matéria do sacramento da Eucaristia. Basicamente os cardeais que estão junto com ele e o defendem apoiam essa mudança, que permite a Eucaristia para quem está "obstinadamente em pecado grave", em segundo casamento.

O primeiro artigo saiu no The Catholic Herald e o segundo no site The Catholic Culture.

Vale à pena ler os dois, mas o do jornal inglês The Catholic Herald é mais lido e mais completo.

Aqui vai o texto que saiu nesse jornal da Inglaterra:

The Church is now in a full-blown civil war over doctrine

by 
posted 
A few weeks ago, the Jesuit journal La Civiltà Cattolica published a startling article on women priests. Its arguments were familiar: the author, deputy editor Fr Giancarlo Pani, asked readers to consider whether an all-male priesthood might perhaps be outdated. “There is unease,” Fr Pani wrote, “among those who fail to understand how the exclusion of woman from the Church’s ministry can coexist with the affirmation and appreciation of her equal dignity.”
What is startling is that this appeared in a journal edited by one of the Pope’s closest advisers, Fr Antonio Spadaro; a journal very close to the Holy See – every page is vetted by the Vatican – which the Pope recently praised. It suggests that the Church, even at its highest levels, is now entering a full-blown civil war over doctrine. There was a further example yesterday, when Vatican Radio promoted a new book by Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio, the president of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts.
Cardinal Coccopalmerio says that the divorced and remarried can receive Communion if they have some wish to change their situation – even if they are not endeavouring to live “as brother and sister”. In some cases, the cardinal says, avoiding sex may be “an impossibility”. He gives the example of a man who is deserted by his wife. The man starts living with another woman. She helps to raise his kids. If the relationship breaks down, the man could be plunged into “deep despair” and the children would be left without a maternal figure. The cardinal writes: “Leaving the union would mean, therefore, not fulfilling a moral duty towards innocent persons.” If avoiding sex would “cause difficulty”, then they should continue having sex to keep the relationship going.
The implications of Cardinal Coccopalmerio’s argument seem at odds with the Church’s doctrine. To take the most obvious point first, the cardinal’s view that an adulterous sexual relationship is compatible with receiving Communion is simply in a head-on clash with Catholic teaching. That the two are incompatible has been taught by Pope St John Paul II in 1981, Benedict XVI in 2007, and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1994, not to mention Popes St Innocent I, St Zachary, St Nicholas I … One could go on.
But this is not the only problem with Cardinal Coccopalmerio’s book. Take his assumption that avoiding sex may be an “impossibility”. It is very hard to square this with the Council of Trent’s declaration: “If anyone says that the commandments of God are, even for one that is justified and constituted in grace, impossible to observe, let him be anathema.” That means that God, our loving Father, will never stop helping us out. But Cardinal Coccopalmerio thinks that avoiding sin may sometimes be beyond us.
Again, the cardinal’s conclusions about continence “causing difficulty” seem dubious. St Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, condemned the idea that one could “do evil so that good may come of it”. The Church has interpreted this very strictly. St Thomas Aquinas, following this perennial teaching, said that one should not have adulterous sex even if it could save an entire country from disaster. But Cardinal Coccopalmerio thinks one can have adulterous sex if it would “cause difficulty” not to.
As for the question of Communion itself: clearly, someone in a continuing adulterous relationship is at high risk of being a state of mortal sin. Only God knows, but if someone is committing a grave sin, while “discerning” their path in relation to Catholic teaching, then this is a pretty substantial possibility. And taking Communion in a state of mortal sin is, according to St John Vianney, patron saint of parish priests, the worst sin of all – worse than crucifying Christ. Many of the divorced and remarried stay away from Communion precisely to avoid committing a mortal sin. Cardinal Coccopalmerio’s approach suggests that this risk is, in some cases, too insignificant to be an obstacle.
Now, of course, the cardinal does not say any of this outright. He does not say, “I think John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and the tradition of the Church are wrong. I suspect the moral law may sometimes be impossible to keep. I have no problem, in principle, with doing evil so that good may come of it. And I do not think that receiving Communion in a state of mortal sin is such a terrible sin that we need to take great precautions against it.” But the mere fact that he does not say these things is hardly a comfort.
The less generous interpretation would be that religious error always tries to avoid clarity. Blessed John Henry Newman noted that the Arians used “vague ambiguous language, which … would seem to bear a Catholic sense, but which, when worked out in the long run, would prove to be heterodox”. The more generous view is that the cardinal has not quite thought through his words, and would retract them if he realised what they implied.
Cardinal Coccopalmerio is a senior Vatican figure: his book has appeared with evident support from within the Vatican, and without official contradiction. And his opinion is close to that of many other prelates (such as the bishops of Malta and most of those in Germany). So the debate about Communion can no longer be seen – if it ever could – as a marginal squabble between “liberals” and “conservatives”. Nor can it be framed as a question of whether you prefer a bit more mercy or a bit more justice. It is now, quite plainly, a debate about whether the teaching of the Church is still valid. And that means the debate will run and run.

quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017

Reino Unido: Criança de 9 Anos Jurou Fidelidade ao Estado Islâmico em Sala de Aula.


Algumas pessoas que leram meu livro sobre Guerra Justa, já me perguntaram como se faz para derrotar o terrorismo islâmico. Certa vez também um amigo economista renomado me enviou um artigo dele sobre terrorismo, usando "teoria dos jogos" (um método da economia).

Esse meu amigo economista e essas pessoas que após lerem meu livro me perguntam sobre como vencer o terrorismo, em geral, pensam o terrorismo islâmico de forma equivocada. O artigo desse meu amigo, por exemplo estava todo errado em termos do que é terrorismo.

Elas imaginam que esse terrorismo é formado por um grupo de pessoas que habitam determinada região e que precisam ser presas ou até mortas, como se fosse a Coreia do Norte.

Eu começo sempre explicando que deve-se buscar o que alimenta o terrorismo islâmico. O que alimenta o terrorismo islâmico é...o Islã, obviamente. As pessoas devem ler o Alcorão para entender o esse terrorismo. Eu escrevi um artigo publicado no Reino Unido, justamente mostrando a base do Alcorão para o terrorismo.

O terrorismo é alimentado por uma ideologia/religião. Sendo assim, o inimigo pode ser seu vizinho, seu marido, seu filho, sua esposa...

Esse terrorismo é pior do que a ideologia comunista, primeiro, porque o comunista deseja viver para dominar as riquezas do mundo, enquanto a ideologia terrorista prega a própria morte do terrorista, se matar infiéis junto com ele, como meio para alcançar a salvação eterna.

Basta a pessoa ficar convencida pela ideologia, que está disponível na internet para quem quiser. Nesse sentido, só se vence o terrorismo islâmico vencendo a ideologia que o alimenta, declarando-a não apta para a vida em sociedade.

Leio hoje sobre o caso do menino de 9 anos que chegou na sala de aula e pronunciou juramento ao Estado Islâmico no Reino Unido. A escola teve de chamar a polícia e o menino foi colocado em tratamento por um ano. Ele aprendeu sobre terrorismo na internet e se convenceu ao ponto de publicamente defender o Estado Islâmico. Onde estavam os pais dele quando ele se convencia? Será que os agentes públicos no Reino Unido são capazes de convencer que se deixa dominar pela ideologia terrorista? Com que base ideológica farão isso para contrapor a ideologia do Islã?

Se isso acontece no Reino Unido, o que deve acontecer em países muçulmanos?

O artigo que trata do menino fala do caso da Turquia, onde muitas escolas estão sendo investigadas.

Vejam o artigo do Clarion Project.

Nine-Year Old Pledges Allegiance to ISIS in UK

A nine-year-old British boy stood up in class and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State terrorist group, he told the media.
Teachers informed the government’s Prevent program, who came to the school and spent a year holding de-radicalization sessions with the child.
Identified only as Haroon and now aged 10, he told the BBC Radio Four’s Today program how he became entranced with the terrorist group following the Paris attacks in 2015.
Haroon began searching for information about the group over the internet. Initially, he found news stories and a Channel Four documentary, but then accessed Islamic State propaganda material directly, including beheading and torture videos.
He also said he had been bullied at school and called a “terrorist” by his classmates, which drove him to Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) propaganda.
"I saw men with hands behind their backs. They were hit and told to sit down. That's when they cut their heads off,” Haroon said.
"On a weekend, everyone was outside playing, so I would sit freely in the living room with the computer."
Radicalizing children is a top priority for ISIS, which produces carefully-branded propaganda material specifically aimed at children.
Meanwhile, Turkish authorities are investigating a number of schools in Istanbul reportedly set up by ISIS.
In one case, prosecutors say they found discs containing notes of classes teaching ISIS material to students. Police are investigating 35 people in connection with the school.
Among other things, the school was allegedly teaching children that those who celebrate Turkish national holidays are “infidels” and educated them to oppose Turkish institutions such as the courts, military and the entire political system.
According to the indictment, prosecutors are seeking aggravated life sentences for six of the suspects in the case on charges of “attempting to remove the constitutional order.” Other suspects are charged with membership in a terrorist organization for which prosecutors are seeking a prison sentence of 15 years each.
Turkish media has reported that more schools are under investigation.
 

terça-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2017

Portugal Prepara Documentação para Beatificação da Irmã Lúcia


Ano passado, eu fui a Fátima. Vocês não fazem ideia da minha vontade de voltar lá.  Penso nisso regularmente.

Esse ano é muito especial pois completa-se 100 anos das aparições de Fátima.

Em 13 de maio de 2000, as crianças Francisco e Jacinta foram beatificadas por João Paulo II. A outra vidente, irmã Lúcia, faleceu em 2005.

Li hoje que Portugal preparou documentação de 15 mil páginas em defesa da beatificação de Lúcia, que será encaminhada ao Vaticano.

Na próxima segunda-feira, dia 20, é o dia de celebração de Francisco e Jacinta. Rezemos para que Lúcia, que tanto agiu em vida em defesa do que Nossa Senhora de Fátima pede, se junte a eles.

Vejam abaixo texto do jornal The Catholic Herald.

Church leaders in Portugal present evidence for Fatima nun’s beatification



segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2017

Hungria: "Europeu, Se Você Quer Fugir do Multiculturalismo e da Imigração Muçulmana, Venha pra Hungria"


Quando me perguntam o que acho que vai acontecer com os cristãos no mundo com o avanço da perseguição religiosa contra eles, seja de muçulmanos ou de ateus, eu respondo que o resultado natural será a criação de um Estado cristão, nos moldes antigos ou nos moldes que é o atual Israel, onde os cristãos poderiam ser cristãos por meio de um forte sistema de defesa.

O primeiro-ministro da Hungria Viktor Orban parece entender isso. E declarou que a Hungria abre as portas para os refugiados europeus que sentem oprimidos pelo multiculturalismo e pela imigração em massa.

Orban ainda apontou o dedo contra a coalizão de elites esquerdistas, advogados de "direitos humanos", traficantes de pessoas, e ricaços como George Soros, que tentam destruir a Europa com seus "globalismos".

Bom, essa coalizão tenta destruir Orban de qualquer forma. Assim, como tenta destronar Trump usando todos os meios.

Vejam artigo do Breibart News abaixo:

Orban: Hungary Will Welcome ‘European Refugees’ Fleeing Multicultural West


Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban says his country will open its arms to west Europeans fleeing mass immigration and “the lords of globalist politics”.


“We shall let in true refugees”, Mr Orban told a cheering audience: “Germans, Dutch, French and Italians, terrified politicians and journalists who here in Hungary want to find the Europe they have lost in their homelands.
The populist leader has served as the de facto leader of the central and eastern European countries which have resisted the open borders policies of the European Union (EU) and leading member-states in the west of the continent.
Globalist politicians, Mr Orban contended, are seeking to “sweep away a democracy of debate and replace it with a democracy of [political] correctness”, where “true power, decisions and influence [are] not held by elected governments, but [by] unelected global networks, media gurus and international organisations.”
He cited Britain’s vote to leave the European Union and Donald Trump’s election in the United States as episodes in a wider popular revolt against the “arrogance and condescension” of global elites by ordinary people whose “mouths had been gagged” for too long.
He claimed that history’s departure from “the course marked out for it” in 2016 “mocked the prophets of liberal politics”, who have responded as though “the people are a danger to democracy”.
This is how the world’s most bizarre coalition of people smugglers, human rights activists and elite European politicians came into existence, specifically to deliberately bring millions of migrants into Europe,” he said.
The Fidesz leader predicted that 2017 would be another year of conflict with the EU, as “Brussels [attempts] to seize further powers” over migration and taxation, among other things.
He also warned against the activities of non-governmental organisations funded from abroad and seeking to exert influence on local politics: “Here there are large predators swimming in the water, and this is the transnational empire of George Soros.”


sexta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2017

Vídeo - Bono Vox (U2): Quem é Jesus Cristo?




Em geral, não gosto de colocar opiniões religiosas de artistas, pois eles costumam ser muito voláteis, muito modistas, especialmente quando são mais novos e precisam do apoio da mídia. Bono Vox já tem muito anos de estrada e está muito firme no panteão dos artistas mundiais. Ele não precisaria tanto seguir o que dita o modismo.

Ele deu a entrevista acima no qual leva o entrevistador a se interessar sobre o que Bono Vox pensa sobre Jesus Cristo.

É interessante ver que o cara que faz entrevista se mostra assustado por Bono Vox acreditar que Cristo é Deus, que Cristo realiza milagres que estão a nossa volta. O entrevistador deve ser um ateu convicto. Bono Vox respondeu com calma e firmeza sua crença em Jesus Cristo.

Bono Vox diz, com conhecimento bíblico, que Cristo disse que ele era o Messias, que ele era Filho de Deus e foi crucificado justamente por dizer isso. Então, só há duas alternativas: Ou Cristo é Deus ou Cristo é louco. Assim, Cristo não pode ser o que muitos pensam, apenas um Mestre ou alguém de valor. Isso não é justificado pelos fatos.

O entrevistador achou que Bono Vox fosse dizer que ou Cristo é Deus ou não é. Mas não é isso. Bono Vox ressalta a firmeza de Cristo em se dizer o Messias a ponto de morrer no pior tipo de morte.

O site The Church Pop lembra que a argumentação de Bono Vox é semelhante a usada por C.S.Lewis que disse que Cristo ou é Deus, ou é louco ou é um mentiroso. Lewis disse que se Cristo não é Deus, ele não pode ser um bom mestre, pois teria mentido radicalmente ou seria um lunático. 

Vejam o vídeo acima e prestem atenção no entrevistador, na incredulidade em ver um astro do rock ter crença em Cristo e ter conhecimento minimamente profundo sobre Cristo.


quinta-feira, 9 de fevereiro de 2017

O Déficit Populacional da Alemanha: Aborto e Contraceptivos Resultaram em Imigração de Muçulmanos.


O site Zero Hedge revela uma pesquisa do próprio governo alemão falando que o país precisa desesperadamente de gente para manter sua população e o financiamento da previdência. A taxa de reprodução na Alemanha é de apenas 1,6, quando o mínimo para manter o nível de população é de 2,1. O país precisa da entrada de 300 mil imigrantes todo ano para manter o nível populacional em 2060. 

E que tipo de pessoas a Alemanha anda importando?

Muçulmanos. Desde 2015, entraram 1 milhão e 300 mil muçulmanos no país. E os gastos públicos alemães com ajuda financeira aos imigrantes são astronômicos e crescendo.

Os muçulmanos em geral possuem uma taxa de reprodução maior que os alemães, então, conclusão: o país vai ser dominado pelo Islã em pouco tempo, como o especialista em Islã, Bernard Lewis, alertou há uma década.

Vejam o relato da pesquisa do governo alemão:

Germany's Muslim Demographic Future

  • Critics of Germany's open-door immigration policy are warning that the recent surge in Germany's Muslim population — which surpassed six million in 2016 for the first time — has already changed the face of the country forever.
  • The price for reversing Germany's demographic decline appears to be the further Islamization of Germany under the guise of multiculturalism.
  • With a fertility rate of 1.6 births per woman, well below the replacement rate of 2.1, Germany will require a permanent influx of 300,000 migrants per year in order keep the current population level stable through the year 2060, according to the report.
  • "We are importing Islamic extremism, Arab anti-Semitism, national and ethnic conflicts of other peoples, as well as a different understanding of society and law. German security agencies are unable to deal with these imported security problems, and the resulting reactions from the German population." — Leaked German intelligence document.
  • More than a decade ago historian Bernard Lewis warned that if current migration trends continue, Europe will be Islamic by the end of the 21st century. Germany's political elites are at the vanguard of making that prediction come true.


Germany will need to take in 300,000 migrants annually for the next 40 years to stop population decline, according to a leaked government report.
The document, parts of which were published by the Rheinische Post on February 1, reveals that the German government is counting on permanent mass migration — presumably from Africa, Asia and the Middle East — to keep the current size of the German population (82.8 million) stable through 2060.
The report implies that Chancellor Angela Merkel's decision to allow into the country some 1.5 million mostly Muslim migrants between 2015 and 2016 was not primarily a humanitarian gesture, but a calculated effort to stave off Germany's demographic decline and to preserve the future viability of the German welfare state.
If most of the new migrants arriving in Germany for the next four decades are from the Islamic world, the Muslim population of Germany could jump to well over 20 million and account for more than 25% of the overall German population by 2060.
Critics of Germany's open-door immigration policy are warning that the recent surge in Germany's Muslim population — which surpassed six million in 2016 for the first time — has already changed the face of the country forever.
Mass migration is fast-tracking the rise of Islam in Germany, as evidenced by the proliferation of no-go zonesSharia courtspolygamychild marriages and honor violence. Mass migration has also been responsible for social chaos, including jihadist attacks, a migrant rape epidemic, a public health crisisrising crime and a rush by German citizens to purchase weapons for self-defense — and even to abandon Germany altogether.
The government has not said how it plans to integrate potentially millions of additional Muslims into German society. The price for reversing Germany's demographic decline appears to be the further Islamization of Germany under the guise of multiculturalism.

According to the report, which was drafted by the Federal Statistics Office (Destatis), the government had previously predicted that Germany's population would drop from a high of 82 million to 73 million by the year 2060 — or even 67.6 million in the worst case scenario. That estimate is now being revised, however, based on a recalculation of forecasts regarding immigration, birth rates and life expectancy.
Due to positive net migration (more people entering the country than leaving it), the German population increased by 1.14 million in 2015, and by another 750,000 in 2016, to reach an all-time high of 82.8 million at the end of 2016, according to preliminary estimates by Destatis.
With a fertility rate of 1.6 births per woman, well below the replacement rate of 2.1, Germany will require a permanent influx of 300,000 migrants per year in order keep the current population level stable through the year 2060, according to the report.
The report stresses the need quickly to integrate migrants into the workforce so that they can begin paying into the social welfare system. "According to past experience, this will not be easy and will take longer than initially often hoped," the report concedes. "Successes will only be visible in the medium to long term."
A recent survey by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung found that the 30 biggest German companies have employed only 54 refugees, including 50 who have been hired as couriers by Deutsche Post, the logistics provider. Company executives said the main problem is that migrants lack professional qualifications and German language skills.
According to the Federal Labor Office, the educational level of newly arrived migrants in Germany is far lower than expected: only a quarter have a high school diploma, while three quarters have no vocational training at all. Only 4% of new arrivals to Germany are highly qualified.
For now, the vast majority of migrants who entered Germany in 2015 and 2016 are wards of the German state. German taxpayers payed around €21.7 billion ($23.4 billion) on aid for refugees and asylum seekers in 2016, and will pay a similar amount in 2017.
A Finance Ministry document revealed that the migrant crisis could end up costing German taxpayers €93.6 billion ($101 billion) between now and 2020. About €25.7 billion would be for social spending, such as unemployment benefits and housing support. About €5.7 billion would be destined for language courses and €4.6 billion for integrating refugees into the workforce.
Mass migration has also increased the demand for housing and has pushed up rental costs for ordinary Germans. Some 350,000 new apartments are required each year to meet demand, but only 245,000 apartments were built in 2014, and another 248,000 in 2015, according to the Rheinische Post.
Meanwhile, migrants committed 208,344 crimes in 2015, according to a police report. This figure represented an 80% increase over 2014 and worked out to around 570 crimes committed by migrants every day, or 23 crimes each hour, between January and December 2015.
A leaked German intelligence document warned that mass migration from the Muslim world will lead to increasing political instability in the country. The document warned that the "integration of hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants will be impossible given the large numbers involved and the already-existing Muslim parallel societies in Germany." The document added:
"We are importing Islamic extremism, Arab anti-Semitism, national and ethnic conflicts of other peoples, as well as a different understanding of society and law. German security agencies are unable to deal with these imported security problems, and the resulting reactions from the German population."
In an interview with Die Welt, an unidentified high-ranking security official said:
"The high influx of people from other parts of the world will lead to the instability of our country. By allowing this mass migration, we are producing extremists. Mainstream society is radicalizing because the majority does not want migration, which is being forced by the political elites. In the future, many Germans will turn away from the constitutional state."
A recent YouGov poll found that 68% of Germans believe that security in the country has deteriorated due to mass migration. Nearly 70% of respondents said they fear for their lives and property in German train stations and subways, while 63% feel unsafe at large public events.
An INSA poll found that 60% of the Germans believe that Islam does not belong to Germany. Nearly half (46%) of those surveyed said they are worried about the "Islamization" of Germany.
If the German election were held today, however, Angela Merkel would easily win another four-year term as chancellor. An INSA poll conducted for Bild on February 2 found that Merkel's ruling Christian Democratic Party (CDU) would win with 33% of the vote, compared to 27% for the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) and 9% for the anti-immigration party Alternative for Germany (AfD).

Calculating the Muslim Population of Germany

Germany now vies with France for the highest Muslim population in Western Europe.
The increase in Germany's Muslim population is being fueled by mass migration. An estimated 300,000 migrants arrived in Germany in 2016, in addition to the more than one million who arrived in 2015. At least 80% (or 800,000 in 2015 and 240,000 in 2016) of the newcomers were Muslim, according to the Central Council of Muslims in Germany.
In addition to the newcomers, the rate of population increase of the Muslim community already living in Germany is around 1.6% per year (or 77,000), according to data extrapolated from a Pew Research Center study on the growth of the Muslim population in Europe.
Based on Pew projections, which were proffered before the current migration crisis, the Muslim population of Germany was to have reached an estimated 5,145,000 by the end of 2015.
Adding the 800,000 Muslim migrants who arrived in Germany in 2015, and the 240,000 who arrived in 2016, combined with the 77,000 natural increase, the Muslim population of Germany jumped by 1,117,000, to reach an estimated 6,262,000 by the end of 2016. This amounts to approximately 7.6% of Germany's overall population of 82.8 million.
The Muslim population of Germany could swell to 20 million as early as 2020, according to the president of the Bavarian Association of Municipalities (Bayerische Gemeindetag), Uwe Brandl. His forecast is based on so-called family reunifications — individuals whose asylum applications are approved will subsequently bring between four and eight additional family members to Germany.
More than a decade ago historian Bernard Lewis warned that if current migration trends continue, Europe will be Islamic by the end of the 21st century. Germany's political elites are at the vanguard of making that prediction come true.