sexta-feira, 10 de abril de 2015

Por Quatro Vezes a Igreja Católica discutiu Comunhão para Divorciados, mas Cristo "shut it down"

Pois é, não é de hoje que tentam dentro da Igreja Católica diminuir a importância do sacramento da comunhão e do sacramento do casamento. 

Marc Rezac, no Catholic News Agency, fala de um artigo que traça a histórico das tentativa de permitir que divorciados que se casaram novamente possa receber comunhão. O texto é Nicholas Healy. Mas Rezac faz um resumo das quatro tentativas.

Sempre que se tentou, a Igreja (ouvindo Cristo) acabou "shut it down". Fiquei pensando em uma tradução fidedigna para esta expressão. Mas não encontrei. Significa algo como: abandonou isso, largou isso, parou com isso.

Vejamos o relato das quatro vezes. É um ótimo relato:

1. 1965 and Vatican II: The argument for allowing communion in certain circumstances to divorced and remarried Catholics can be traced back, at least in recent history, to the fourth session of the Second Vatican Council. Archbishop Elias Zoghby, the patriarchal vicar of the Melkites in Egypt, proposed that the Eastern practice of tolerating remarriage in certain cases should be considered. Even though Zobhby triggered a swift and negative response, dissenters still use this instance as an example in their favor.
Shut it down: At the request of Pope Paul VI, all normal activities of the Council were suspended until the proposal was addressed. Cardinal Journet was asked by the Pope to respond to Zoghby, and citing Mk 10:2 and 1 Cor 7:10–11, he concluded that “the teaching of the Catholic Church on the indissolubility of sacramental marriage is the very teaching of the Lord Jesus that has been revealed to us and has always been safeguarded and proclaimed in the Church . . . the Church has no authority to change what is of divine law.”
2. 1970s: Despite the Church’s response at the Second Vatican Council, the 1970s saw a barrage of publications from Catholic theologians and bishops advocating for a change in Church teaching, particularly in the United States and in Germany. In 1972, a study committee commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America issued an “Interim Pastoral Statement” on “The Problem of Second Marriages,” arguing that not only should the divorced and remarried be admitted back to the sacraments, but that the Church needed to rethink and redefine the very ideas of consummation and indissolubility. That same year in Germany, several prominent bishops and theologians such as Schnackenburg, Ratzinger*, Lehmann, and Böckle wrote volumes on the matter, arguing for leniency in certain circumstances similar to practices in the Orthodox Church (called oikonomia, which roughly translates to “stewardship” or “management of a household”).
*Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, officially retracted his support of communion for the divorced and remarried in a letter published in The Tablet in 1991, and has several times since voiced his support for Church teaching as expressed in “Familiaris Consortio”.
Shut it down: The Church holds a Synod on the Family in 1980, as divorces were on the rise throughout the world. The result of the 1980 Synod was Pope John Paul II’s 1981 apostolic exhortation “Familiaris Consortio”(roughly, “Of Family Partnership”), which contains beautiful reflections on the role of the family in God’s divine plan, and specifically includes a section about irregular situations. Addressing the situation of the divorced and civilly remarried, Pope John Paul II says the following:
Together with the Synod, I earnestly call upon pastors and the whole community of the faithful to help the divorced, and with solicitous care to make sure that they do not consider themselves as separated from the Church, for as baptized persons they can, and indeed must, share in her life. They should be encouraged to listen to the word of God, to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass, to persevere in prayer, to contribute to works of charity and to community efforts in favor of justice, to bring up their children in the Christian faith, to cultivate the spirit and practice of penance and thus implore, day by day, God’s grace. Let the Church pray for them, encourage them and show herself a merciful mother, and thus sustain them in faith and hope.
However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.
3. 1993: Three prominent German bishops, Oskar Saier, Walter Kasper, and Karl Lehmann, publish a letter on pastoral care for the divorced and remarried, essentially saying that while what Pope John Paul II said in Familiaris Consortio is very nice and generally true, it can’t possibly apply to every difficult situation that arises. These bishops then proposed their own guide for divorced and remarried Catholics to determine their worthiness for the sacraments, as guided by a pastor. There were three conditions the German bishops laid out for the possibility of communion: the individuals should be repentant for the failure of the first marriage; the second civil marriage has to “prove itself over time as stable”; and the “commitments assumed in the second marriage have to be accepted.” Under these conditions, the bishops argued, civilly remarried people could in good conscience receive the Eucharist without the need to live continently.

Shut it down: In 1994, The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued an indirect response to the German bishops in the “Letter Concerning Communion”, which said church teaching “cannot be modified for difficult situations.” While it never mentioned the letter from the German bishops, it was clearly written in response to it. The Congregation’s letter cited passages from Scripture, Familiaris Consortio, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to support Church teaching, and addressed false notions of conscience that would allow individuals to determine for themselves whether or not their first marriage was valid.
4. 1994-2005: Literature published by various bishops and theologians still showed a tendency to stray from Pope John Paul II’s teaching in “Familiaris Consortio”, leading the Church to call for a Synod on the Eucharist in 2005, during which the issue was studied and addressed extensively.
Shut it down: Pope Benedict XVI issued a post-Synod apostolic exhortation called “Sacramentum Caritatis”, in which he confirmed Church doctrine and practice. He also called for a deeper theological understanding of the relationship between the sacrament of marriage and the sacrament of the Eucharist, and asked for better pastoral efforts in the area of marriage preparation for young people.
There are two important things to remember when considering this issue. The first is that the pain and separation felt by divorced and remarried Catholics is real, and the exhortation of the recent Popes to reach out to these people in the Church should be taken seriously by clergy and lay faithful alike. The second thing to remember is that while the pain of the divorced and remarried is a serious issue, it is not the only important and pressing issue in the Church at the moment, with thousands of Christians fleeing their homes or being slaughtered at the hands of Islamic extremists both in the Middle East and Africa.
Still, because the issue continues to arise, the Synod Fathers will address it at the Synod on the Family later this year, and Pope Francis will write an apostolic exhortation on the matter some time after that. Let us continue to pray for all in Church leadership, and that those in authority have the courage to trust that the Holy Spirit will shut it down, as he has always done when erroneous proposals threaten Church doctrine and unity.

2 comentários:

Adilson J. da Silva disse...

Após alguns dias afastados, aqui estou, meu nobre Pedro.
Desde que me voltei para o seio católico, venho meditando muito sobre o porquê de muitas pessoas, especialmente os protestantes, não se tornarem católicos (me refiro ao Brasil). De muitas conclusões que tenho tirado (com a ajuda de bons católicos leigos, padres e intelectuais), a mais real, creio eu, é que a partir do século passado, um véu de combate à Tradição, de heresia e apostasia foram lançados sobre o Santo seio católico. Agora, está em andamento o processo de beatificação de um desobediente da Santa Igreja: dom Helder. Um comunista. Ele sabia da condenação do comunismo pela Santa Igreja e mesmo assim praticava tal ideologia. Nasci em Recife, uma das cidades mais atacadas pelos inimigos de fora e, especialmente, de dentro da Igreja. Como a maioria das crianças nesse país, os pais batizam as crianças e acham que cumpriu tudo. Algumas volta a fazer a primeira comunhão, e depois somem. Os padres esvaziaram os catecismos delegando a função a mulheres e jovens. Ou seja: um abandono geral, um descaso pelas almas. Essas almas vão sendo assassinadas justamente pelas atitudes de padres fracos e hereges, e pela infiltração dos inimigos da Igreja. Algumas, sem o esclarecimento necessário, vão para o protestantismo (meu caso, pois estão sedentas pela verdade e pelo mínimo de apologia do Cristianismo. Que Deus tenha dó de misericórdia do Brasil. Tudo isso me faz refletir sobre as aparições de Nossa Senhora das Graças, em Pesqueira, PE. Abraços, Pedro!

Pedro Erik disse...

Você tem toda razão, caro Adilson.
Estou escrevendo um livro sobre guerra justa que se chama no momento Missing Tradition (está em inglês por enquanto).
A Igreja está abandonando a tradição.
Mas muitos escreveram contra comunismo especialmente pio x e pio xii. Até João xxiii escreveu um pouco.
Mas tem tempo que abandona a tradição.
É muito triste.
Pedro Erik