O Estado
Islâmico saudou essa semana um terrorista que praticou
atentado terrorista na cidade de Mosul. Esse terrorista se chamava Jamal
al-Harith, era inglês da cidade Manchester e tinha o nome de guerra de Abu
Zakariya al-Britani.
Ele tinha sido preso pelas forças dos Estados Unidos na Afeganistão e levado para a prisão de Guantanamo em 2002. Sendo solto em 2004 a pedido do governo inglês.
Ele então processou o governo inglês alegando maus tratos e recebeu do governo 1 milhão de libras.
Em 2014, Jamil conseguiu ir para a Síria e se juntou ao Estado Islâmico.
Que coisa, heim? E tem gente que diz que o terrorismo é uma questão de pobreza. Nascer em país rico, com várias redes de proteção social e receber um milhão de libras não é suficiente?
Vejam o relato do jornal The Guardian:
Isis suicide bomber ‘was
Briton freed from Guantánamo’
Family
identifies Jamal al-Harith, paid £1m compensation by UK government, as man
Islamic State says was behind Mosul attack
A suicide attack near
the Iraqi city of Mosul,
for which Islamic State has claimed responsibility, was carried out by a
British former Guantánamo Bay detainee who was paid £1m in compensation by the
UK government after his release, according to reports.
Jamal al-Harith, a 50-year-old Muslim
convert from Manchester – who was born Ronald Fiddler – was identified by his
family as the man Isis claims carried out the attack on coalition forces on
Monday.
The terror
group released an image of a smiling man, whom it gave the nom de guerre
Abu-Zakariya al-Britani. While its claim that he was the attacker has not been
verified, al-Harith’s brother confirmed the identity of the man in the picture
to the Times.
Leon Jameson told the paper his brother
al-Harith had “wasted his life”. He added: “It is him, I can tell by his smile.
If it is true then I’ve lost a brother, so another family [member] gone.” The BBC and Channel 4 News also cited unnamed sources as identifying the same man
in the picture.
Isis made unverified claims to have
caused multiple casualties when its fighters drove a car filled with explosives
into a military base outside the city in northern Iraq. It released a video of a vehicle driving away down a
road, followed later by a plume of smoke rising in the distance.
Al-Harith was reportedly awarded
compensation after claiming that British agents knew he was being
mistreated during the time he was
held without charge at Guantánamo.
He was taken to the detention centre
after being found in a
prison in Afghanistanearly in
2002, where he had been placed after being intercepted by the Taliban, who
believed him to be a British spy. According to his sister, Maxine Fiddler, he
initially believed the Americans to be “his saviours”. However, they imprisoned
him after coming to the conclusion that he had tried to join the Islamic
fundamentalist group – until they turned on him.
In an
interview in 2003, the year before al-Harith’s release, Maxine Fiddler said her
brother had converted to Islam in his 20s. She said she believed he had found
peace in doing so after a difficult childhood. She described him as “a very
smart, a very serious person”, adding that he was gentle and quiet, with a
sense of humour.
Al-Harith’s Guantánamo
file showed that he was
taken to the camp because he was “expected to have knowledge of Taliban
treatment of prisoners and interrogation tactics”.
His release was recommended by
Guantánamo’s commandant in 2002 “on the assessment that the detainee was not
affiliated with al-Qaida or a Taliban leader”. But he was kept in captivity
because it was decided he had been involved in a “terrorist attack against the
US”, despite the fact he had not been questioned about one.
It was
also noted that his “timeline has not been fully established” and that British
diplomats who had dealt with him after his release in Pakistan thought he was
“cocky and evasive”. He was finally released in 2004 after lobbying by the then
home secretary David Blunkett, who said that none of the people whose release
from Guantánamo he had secured “will actually be a threat to the security of
the British people”.
A decade later, and despite his high
profile, al-Harith was able to travel to Syria, one of about 850 individuals of
national security concern who have travelled to join the conflict, according to
figures published by the government last year. Of those, a little less than
half have returned to the UK and about 15% are dead.
Um comentário:
Isso é o mesmo que indenizar presos no Brasil, enquanto as vítmas dos hospitais, saúde, educação e morte por violencia etv. causados por um Estado bandido - que explodam!
Há coisa errada por detrás disso - arrecadação, promoção da bandidagem etc?
Postar um comentário