quinta-feira, 2 de março de 2017

Cardeais que Apoiaram Eleição do Papa Francisco Querem que Ele Renuncie.


O jornal the London Times anuncia hoje que um grupo de cardeais que apoiaram a eleição do Papa Francisco agora deseja que ele renuncie para evitar um cisma que "seria pior que a reforma protestante". E ainda sugerem que após essa renúncia, assuma o cardeal Pietro Parolin. O jornal relata 12 cardeais defendendo isso e ressalta que o número de cardeais não importa mas sim a influência deles. Também é lembrado que esse grupo de cardeais não é formado por cardeais conservadores, mas apenas por aqueles que estão preocupados com o desmembramento da Igreja.

Finalmente, o jornal lembra que não há chance do Papa Francisco renunciar "pois ele tem um viés autoritário e tentará completar suas reformas"

Vejamos o relato do jornal The London Times:

Anti-reform cardinals ‘want the Pope to quit’
A group of cardinals who supported the election of Pope Francis are worried that his controversial reforms are leading the Catholic church towards a schism and are planning to appeal to him to step down, a leading Vatican watcher has claimed.

“A large part of the cardinals who voted for him is very worried and the curia . . . that organised his election and has accompanied him thus far, without ever disassociating itself from him, is cultivating the idea of a moral suasion to convince him to retire,” Antonio Socci wrote in the Italian newspaper Libero.

The conservative Catholic author and journalist said that the election four years ago of Jorge Mario Bergoglio had been backed by progressive German cardinals and a curia faction impatient with the rule of his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.

It was the latter faction who now believed that the Pope should resign and who would like to replace him with Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary of state, Mr Socci said. He believed that the group numbered around a dozen, “but the importance of the members counts more than their number”.

Four years after Benedict XVI’s renunciation and Bergoglio’s arrival on the scene, the situation of the Catholic church has become explosive, perhaps really on the edge of a schism, which could be even more disastrous than Luther’s [who is today being rehabilitated by the Bergoglio church],” Mr Socci wrote.

What was significant, he said, was that the doubters were not the conservative cardinals who had been in open opposition to the Pope since early in his reign.

Putting pressure on a pope to resign is a crime punishable under canon law, Mr Socci added, so it was unclear how the moral suasion might be exercised. “The cardinals are worried that the church could be shattered as an institution. There are many indirect ways in which the pressure might be exerted.”

The Pope’s openings to modernity on sexual morality, communion for remarried Catholics and friendly relations with other religions have opened a gulf between progressives and traditionalists.

“A good number of the majority that voted for Bergoglio in 2013 have come to regret their decision,” one expert on the Vatican said, “but I don’t think it’s plausible that members of the hierarchy will pressure the Pope to resign. Those who know him know it would be useless. [He] has a very authoritarian streak. He won’t resign until he has completed his revolutionary reforms, which are causing enormous harm.”

Antonio Pelayo, a Catholic priest who covers the Vatican for Spanish television, said that there were between ten and twenty conservative cardinals openly opposed to the Pope’s reforms, but only two or three who had voted for him and who now regretted it.


• Marie Collins, an Irish abuse victim, resigned from the Pope’s commission for child protection yesterday, citing institutional resistance to reform from within the Vatican curia. She said there were “fine words in public and contrary actions behind closed doors” and appeared to criticise the Pope for a decision to reduce sanctions against a perpetrator.


O site católico EWTN relatou o que descreve o jornal.


BY DEACON NICK DONNELLY


The London Times newspaper is reporting that a group of cardinals who supported Pope Francis now want him to resign and be replaced by Cardinal Pietro Parolin because they fear his reforms will cause a schism "more disastrous" than the Reformation. The Times article draws on a report by the Vatican expert Antonio Socci, a prominent Italian Catholic journalist.
Antonio Socci reports that it is the curial faction of the Holy See that backed the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio out of "impatience with the rule of his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI" that now wants Pope Francis to resign out of fear of an impending schism. The Times reports:
A large part of the cardinals who voted for him is very worried and the curia . . . that organised his election and has accompanied him thus far, without ever disassociating itself from him, is cultivating the idea of a moral suasion to convince him to retire.
It was the latter faction who now believed that the Pope should resign and who would like to replace him with Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary of state, Mr Socci said. He believed that the group numbered around a dozen, but the importance of the members counts more than their number. Four years after Benedict XVI’s renunciation and Bergoglio’s arrival on the scene, the situation of the Catholic church has become explosive, perhaps really on the edge of a schism, which could be even more disastrous than Luther’s [who is today being rehabilitated by the Bergoglio church].
The cardinals are worried that the church could be shattered as an institution. There are many indirect ways in which the pressure might be exerted.
An expert on the Vatican gave this assessment of the latest development:
A good number of the majority that voted for Bergoglio in 2013 have come to regret their decision, but I don’t think it’s plausible that members of the hierarchy will pressure the Pope to resign. Those who know him know it would be useless. [He] has a very authoritarian streak. He won’t resign until he has completed his revolutionary reforms, which are causing enormous harm.
Antonio Socci reports that the significance of this development is that the group who want Pope Francis to resign are not the "conservative" cardinals who have opposed the Holy Father's innovations, "What was significant, he said, was that the doubters were not the conservative cardinals who had been in open opposition to the Pope since early in his reign."


10 comentários:

Anônimo disse...

http://gpsdoagronegocio.blogspot.com.br/2017/03/papa-francisco-muro-cubano-pontes-e.html

Anônimo disse...

Esse bando de safado gente busquem a Deus somente ele dá o perdão e a vida eterna esse tal de padre,papa,cardeal são um bando de comedor de arroz feijão mais pecador que eu ou você

Lucia Vieira Rodrigues Pinto disse...

aproveitemos o tempo de penitência e deixemos de julgar para não ser julgado.

Pedro Erik disse...

Feliz Páscoa, cara Lúcia Vieira.
Fique com Deus.

Abraço,
Pedro Erik

Unknown disse...

O cara foi falar a verdade para o mundo , e olha como eles (sociedade) tão a caça de sua cabeça .....0 mundo não pode ficar na mentira acorda humanidade....

Pedro Erik disse...

Caríssimo, por favor, nos diga que tipo de verdade você se refere. Assim, ficaria mais clara a sua argumentação.

Abraço,
Pedro Erik

Angela Freire disse...

Primeira visita, blog muito bom. Espero que os haters não venham pra cá...

Pedro Erik disse...

Muito obrigado, Angela, espero que continue gostando do que escrevo.

Bom, eu controlo os comentários, assim os haters não aparecem para meus ilustres leitores. Fique tranquila.

Abraço,
Pedro

Aziz disse...

Caro Eric, pelo tom usado , acredito sinceramente que o ilustre desconhecido aí acima, nem sequer sabe o significado da palavra verdade, ele próprio deve ser uma farsa,haja visto que nem coragem de por seu nome e imagem real no comentário ele pôs,portanto, é só mais alienado entupido de mortadela falando besteiras, ou seja, não deve ser levado em consideração.

Anônimo disse...

Muda-se o maestro mas a orquestra sempre foi e será a maesma