Em geral, eu costumo usar um régua simples para começar a pensar em votar em alguém: o candidato é fortemente contra o aborto? Se a resposta for positiva, o candidato tem boa chance de ganhar meu voto.
Os dois candidatos na França não são fortemente contra o aborto. Aliás, na Europa dificilmente se tem um candidato nessa linha. Na França, o candidato mais próximo de se dizer contra o aborto foi François Fillon, mas ele disse que não ia fazer nada contra o aborto se ganhasse. Assim, perderia meu voto imediatamente.
O aborto para mim é um ato extremamente cruel ao ser humano mais desprotegido de todos. E Cristo foi muito incisivo a quem fizesse mal às crianças e ressaltou o valor da vida. Em geral, seria bem mais fácil votar nos Estados Unidos porque por lá se entende que aborto é um tema essencial em política.
Hoje, li sobre as dúvidas dos católicos sobre em quem votar na França no site La Croix.
Le Pen se mostra não caridosa com estrangeiros, o que é uma ofensa às palavras de Cristo, por outro lado, ela parece defender a França cristã, que é essencial ao mundo cristão, não só na Europa. Le Pen promete por um fim a ideia de União Europeia. Eu acho também que a ideia de União Europeia não é uma ideia boa para a Europa nem economicamente nem muito menos socialmente. Mas Le Pen procura fugir do debate sobre aborto, sinaliza não mexer com isso.
Macron se diz que não é de direita, nem de esquerda. Eu não voto em ninguém que fala isso. Simplesmente não voto em covardes políticos. E isso não costuma dar certo, pois uma candidato de centro fará um governo que juntará gente de esquerda e de direita e o governo não será gerenciável. Ainda mais com pessoas inexperientes, como é o caso de Macron.
E Macron promete continuar as políticas sociais da esquerda da França que destroem a família, como casamento gay e aborto, duas ações que simplesmente rasgam a Bíblia.
Hoje eu li um artigo sobre Macron que revela como ele é falso na sua vida, religiosamente falso, falso banqueiro, politicamente falso e socialmente falso.
Em resumo, o texto revela que Macron é um banqueiro que não entende de finanças, que foi protegido por ricaços, que quando tinha 15 anos seduziu sua professora que era casada e tinha três filhos e era 24 anos mais velha. Hoje, Macron que tem apenas 39 anos é casado com essa professora de 63 anos que já tem netos. Como lembra o autor do texto, se fosse um menina de 15 anos e um professor de 40 anos, o mundo diria que o professor era pedófilo, mas o mundo exalta Macron pelas suas "ações não convencionais em termos de relacionamento". Macron, inclusive, teve de negar rumores de que seria gay.
Se eu fosse francês, não veria saída a não ser em votar em Le Pen.
Leiam parte do texto que explica o falso Macron, publicado no site Liberty Blitzkrieg, que menciona um artigo do Financial Times.
Meet Emmanuel Macron – The Consummate Banker Puppet, Bizarre Elitist Creation
...
Most Americans paying attention to global affairs have some conception of his opponent, nationalist firebrand Marine Le Pen, but Macron is likely to be very much a black box. I hope today’s post changes that.
Any knowledge you may have about Macron probably comes from mainstream news outlets, which have been uniformly gushing about the socialist-centrist Rothschild protege.
As an example, just take a look at the following title from a January article published at Foreign Policy.
...
I came to this conclusion based on an extremely enlightening article published in the FT titled, Emmanuel Macron’s Rothschild Years Make Him an Easy Election Target. Based on the title, you’d think that the man merely had a normal, brief stint at the bank, but you’d be wrong. As you read, it becomes clear that he was groomed from day one by a Rothschild partner and ended up on a fast track like I’ve never seen before. But first, let’s examine the first two paragraphs of the article, which betrays the man’s intentions.
When Emmanuel Macron told friends in 2008 he was joining Rothschild, the prestigious investment bank, the then 30-year-old civil servant was warned it could scupper a future career in politics.“You’re conscious that banking is not any kind of job? And Rothschild not any kind of bank?” said one friend to the man who, nine years later, would become frontrunner in France’s presidential election.
Contrary to media myths about a “white knight” who came out of nowhere to save France, this character has had his eye on high political office for at least a decade. Indeed, it appears Macron has been groomed by powerful financiers for a very long time. As the FT also notes:
The graduate of ENA, the elite school that breeds France’s future leaders, came recommended by powerful alumni of the institution, including François Henrot, a longtime Rothschild partner. But young bankers were not so impressed.“He was the guy who would constantly say ‘thank you’,” a former colleague said. “He didn’t know what ebitda [earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation] was. He didn’t try to hide it. And instead of looking it up in a corporate finance book, he asked around, which was disarming.”
Yet it wasn’t just a Rothschild sponsor who took the young Macron under his wing…
What Mr Macron lacked in technical knowledge and jargon at first, he made up for with contacts in government, says Sophie Javary, head of BNP Paribas’ corporate finance in Europe, who was asked by Mr Henrot to coach Mr Macron in the first year.This is straight up bizarre. It appears Macron was so important to banking interests the had to form a consortium of firms to all pitch in to help him out. Yet it gets stranger still.On the Atos deal, Mr Macron “had a fairly junior role at the time — he would be asked to redo the financial models on Excel, the basics,” recalled an adviser. But a few days after the deal was announced, Mr Macron was made a partner. A few months later, he stunned colleagues and rivals by winning a role in Nestlé’s purchase of Pfizer’s infant food operations.
As someone who spent ten years on Wall Street, I can tell you with certainty that you don’t go from updating excel models at a junior level to partner overnight. Someone extraordinarily powerful was pulling all sorts of strings for this guy. There seems to be little doubt about this.
Further hints that Macron is a total manufactured elitist creation can be seen with the following.
At the bank, Mr Macron mastered the art of networking and navigated around the numerous conflicts of interest that arise in close-knit Parisian business circles, making good use of his connections as an Inspecteur des Finances — an elite corps of the very highest-ranking graduates from ENA.In 2010, he advised, for free, the staff of Le Monde when the newspaper was put up for sale. Journalists at the daily started doubting his loyalty when they happened upon him in conversation with Mr Minc, who was representing a bidding consortium that the staff opposed. They did not know that it was Mr Minc, a fellow Inspecteur des Finances, who had helped the young Mr Macron secure his interview at Rothschild.A media executive who was part of the same consortium recalled: “It wasn’t clear who Emmanuel worked for. He was around, trading intelligence, friends with everyone. It was smart, because he got to know everybody in the media world.”
Indeed, who does he work for? I’m sure the French people would like to know.
Meanwhile, Macron is like a conspiracy website’s wet dream. Not only was he groomed by Rothschild bankers, he was also a Bilderberg meeting attendee in 2014. Of course.
Incredibly enough, Macron’s personal life is just as bizarre. Wikipedia notes:
Raised in a non-religious family, he was baptized a Roman Catholic at his own request at age 12.
Impressive that the man figured out religion at such a young age, but what’s even more bizarre is what he did three years later. At 15, shortly after discovering Jesus, he decided to seduce his high school teacher who was 24 years older and married with three children. I’m not in the habit of quoting Slate, but an article on this topic published there was excellent. We learn:
At 39, Emmanuel Macron would be France’s youngest-ever president. His wife, Brigitte Trogneux, just turned 64. The two met when Macron was 15 years old; Trogneux was his high-school drama teacher. After putting off the young Macron’s advances for a while, Trogneux eventually divorced her husband—the father of her three children—and moved to Paris to be with Macron, who’d left his hometown to finish high school in the capital city. They married more than a decade after meeting, in 2007.Media accounts of their once-illicit relationship have offered it as evidence of Macron’s daring personality and willingness to break with tradition, qualities that helped make him a presidential frontrunner without a political party or any experience in elected office. “Their love affair was the kind of audacious undertaking that has defined Mr. Macron’s life and career,” the New York Timesreports. “His sheer drive, his focus and his willingness to leapfrog in a country where most success is built step by step make him more like the entrepreneurs he admires than a typical politician.” The Associated Press writes that, “from his teenage romance with a teacher to his recent ambition to become president, Emmanuel Macron often is described as unconventional and tenacious.”This is a strange way to frame a romantic relationship between a teenager and his 40-year-old teacher. If Macron were a young woman who’d seduced her male high-school teacher away from his wife and family, her determination and ultimate success would not be proffered as signs of her leadership skills, the beginning of a life as an effective politician. She would be cast as an opportunistic Jezebel with daddy issues who slept her way into every political role she got. If Macron were an ex-teacher who’d left his wife to be with a teenage student, we’d rightly cast doubt on his maturity and morals. Depending on the details of the case, I might think he should have lost his teaching job and wonder which combination of possible gross reasons caused him to reject women his own age.Swap Macron and Trogneux’s gender again, and the story of a goal-oriented romancer would be spun as a conventional tale of an unhinged, desperate homewrecker. Conquering resistance through patient pursuit would, to most observers, seem like obsessed-stalker behavior coming from a young girl and sexual-predator behavior coming from an older man. Macron’s disregard of Trogneux’s initial rejection—and his dogged fixation on making her his girlfriend despite her marriage and his age—don’t ring such alarm bells because we’re far more used to seeing older men with way-younger women.
What’s most notable about the above is how corporate media such as The New York Times celebrates Macron’s less than savory behavior in his pursuit of Trogneux. It may not be fake news, but it certainly looks a lot like pro-Macron propaganda.
Finally, I’d like to end with the following tweet, which I think summarizes the situation.
The bottom line is Macron is a total fake. Indeed, he’s almost embarrassingly phony, but will it matter? My feeling is that he will probably win the May 7th runoff, but I don’t think the spread will be anywhere near as wide as everyone is predicting. I continue to think that it won’t be France, but more likely Italy, which will put the final nail in the EU coffin.
As always, we shall see.
8 comentários:
Entre dois candidatos medíocres, qual deles poderia ser menos nocivo, já que nenhum deles é recomendável?
De forma contrariada, votaria le Pen, só de ser antiislamita, descartar do país maus elementos da ideologia da deusa lua Alah, vetar entrada de mais "imigrantes" muçulmanos e anti UE, portanto anti NOM, a principio, poderia ser bem nenos prejudicial à nação!
Por isto acompanho este Blog. Só aqui para ter este tipo de informação católica. Estava achando que a Marine seria um Trump para a França, mas pelo texto vejo que estava errado.
Obrigado, caríssimo Jacyr.
Le Pen nem de longe é um Trump, meu amigo, nem em questões sociais (Trump se tornou um defensor da vida, na luta contra o aborto), muito menos em questões econômicas (Le Pen tende para o keynesianismo e Trump é mais liberal economicamente). Acho que os dois só se encontram na importância da defesa das fronteiras.
Macron é mais parecido com Obama, inexperiente e falso. Mas talvez menos perigoso que Obama. Obama é realmente um ideólogo de esquerda. Macron está mais para um perdido que tem apoio de ricaços e da mídia.
Abraço,
Pedro Erik
Os franceses estão em um "mato sem cachorro". :(
Se eu tivesse que votar, votaria em Le Pen. Seria a opção "menos ruim).
Macron é franco-maçom.
Não sei se tenho dó ou penso que a França realmente merece estar como está. Ao mesmo tempo que foi o berço de grandes Santos e tão importante para o cristianismo, também foi o berço da maçonaria e responsável pela propagação de tantos erros. Que Deus tenha misericórdia deles, mesmo sem merecer. Assim como está tendo com o Brasil. Parabéns Pedro. Um grande abraço.
Excelente análise, Pedro!
Esclareceu muita coisa.
Muito obrigado!
Jonas
Obrigado,meu amigo.
Abraço,
Pedro
Postar um comentário