quarta-feira, 18 de novembro de 2015

Dos 2.184 Refugiados Sírios nos EUA, 2.098 são Muçulmanos e apenas 53 são Cristãos. E a Culpa é da ONU.



O Obama declarou em Paris, após os atentados da última sexta, que não faz distinção de religião para receber refugiados. Mas hoje foi provado que ele mentiu, ele faz sim distinção e é contra cristãos. Ele usa a Organização para Refugiados para ONU para acolher aqueles que fogem da Síria e essa organização sabe a  religião dos refugiados e assim os Estados Unidos também sabem. A tabela acima é do Departamento de Refugiados dos EUA e mostra que religião tem cada refugiado sírio recebido pelo país.

Claramente se vê que a enorme maioria dos recebidos pelos Estados Unidos, 96%, são muçulmanos. Enquanto, apenas 2,4% são cristãos. Isso é uma enorme disparidade, mesmo porque os cristãos da Síria representam 10% da população.

O site da CNS News diz que os cristãos têm medo de ir para campos de refugiados da ONU, porque eles não estão salvos nesses campos, são atacados lá também. Assim, os refugiados que saem desses campos são na imensa maioria muçulmanos. Os cristãos procuram abrigo em igrejas, escolas ou casa de parentes.

Se os cristãos são atacados por muçulmanos em pleno campo de refugiados, como esses muçulmanos farão quando entrarem nos países ocidentais?

Um Anglicano ressalta que os países muçulmanos é que deveriam receber os muçulmanos em campos de refugiados.

Você acha que os governos não sabem como a Organização para Refugiados da ONU seleciona os refugiados?

Vejam reportagem da CNS News.

So Far: Syrian Refugees in U.S. Include 2,098 Muslims, 53 Christians

By Patrick Goodenough | November 17, 2015 | 4:29 AM EST

(CNSNews.com) – President Obama said Monday that calls from some quarters for the U.S. to admit only Christian refugees from Syria were “shameful,” yet the reality is that today’s refugee system discriminates, not against Syrian Muslims, but against Christians and other non-Muslim minorities.

Critics say this is because the federal government relies on the United Nations in the refugee application process – and since Syrian Christians are often afraid to register with the U.N., they and other non-Muslims are left out.

Fleeing persecution at the hands of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and other jihadist groups, Syrian Christians generally avoid U.N. refugee camps because they are targeted there too.

Most refugees considered for resettlement in the U.S. are referred by the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Applications are then handled by one of nine State Department-managed resettlement support centers around the world, a process that includes vetting and interviews by the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and takes an average of 18-24 months. There are occasions when a process can begin without UNHCR referral, but this usually applies in cases of close relatives of refugees already in the U.S.

Of 2,184 Syrian refugees admitted into the U.S. since the Syrian civil war erupted in 2011, only 53 (2.4 percent) have been Christians while 2098 (or 96 percent) have been Muslims, according to State Department statistics updated on Monday.

The remaining 33 include 1 Yazidi, 8 Jehovah Witnesses, 2 Baha’i, 6 Zoroastrians, 6 of "other religion," 7 of "no religion," and 3 atheists.

By comparison, Syria’s population breakdown in early 2011, before the civil war’s death toll and refugee exodus roiled the demographics, was 90 percent Muslim (including Sunnis, Shia, Alawites and Druze) and 10 percent Christian, according to the CIA World Factbook.

In the wake of the Paris terror attacks, some Republican presidential candidates and governors are calling on the administration to reconsider a plan to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees in the current fiscal year.

On Monday, Arkansas Republican Sens. Tom Cotton and John Boozman also called for a temporary moratorium, but as part of a broader new policy on Syrian refugees that also deals with the U.N. referral problem.

“The United States’ reliance on the United Nations for referrals of Syrian refugees should also be re-evaluated,” they said. “That reliance unintentionally discriminates against Syrian Christians and other religious minorities who are reluctant to register as refugees with the United Nations for fear of political and sectarian retribution.”

According to Patrick Sookhdeo, international director of Barnabas Fund, a charity campaigning to help rescue Christians from Syria, Christians fleeting ISIS “seldom go to the main refugee camps in neighboring countries because they are marginalized, abused, and at serious risk of violence in these Muslim-majority shelters.”

Sookhdeo says Western governments “must understand that vulnerable Christians are being overlooked in rescue program that take only those in the camps to safety. Fully aware of the victimization that is likely to await them in refugee camps, Iraqi and Syrian believers are mainly taking shelter in schools, churches, and apartments, or with relatives where possible.”

As a result, some refugee advocates say Western diplomatic missions should work through churches in urban areas in the countries neighboring Syria, to offer refuge for vulnerable Christians.

Prioritize the ‘most victimized’

In September Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, introduced a bill that would give Congress an up-or-down vote on Obama’s plan to resettle 10,000 Syrian refugees – and would also require the administration, when considering applicants from Syria and Iraq, to prioritize the resettlement of “persecuted” religious minorities.
Carey also tackled the sensitive Christian versus Muslim issue.

On Sunday, GOP presidential candidate Jeb Bush said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that U.S. efforts to help Syrian refugees should focus on Christians, “who have no place in Syria anymore. They're being beheaded, they’re being executed by both sides. And I think we have a responsibility to help.”

Obama, speaking in Turkey, said calls to admit Syrian Christians but not Muslims were “shameful” and “not American.”

Other Western countries are also grappling with the controversial issue.

Last September George Carey, a former leader of the world’s Anglicans, urged the British government to prioritize Christians among the Syrian refugees “because they are a particularly vulnerable group.”

Carey said in an op-ed a government plan to admit thousands more Syrians by way of refugee camps located in the region “inadvertently discriminates against the very Christian communities most victimized by the inhuman butchers of the so-called Islamic State.”

“Christians are not to be found in the U.N. camps, because they have been attacked and targeted by Islamists and driven from them,” he said.

Carey also tackled the sensitive Christian versus Muslim issue.

“Some will not like me saying this, but in recent years, there has been too much Muslim mass immigration to Europe,” he wrote. “This has resulted in ghettos of Muslim communities living parallel lives to mainstream society, following their own customs and even their own laws.”

“Isn’t it high-time instead for the oil-rich Gulf States to open their doors to the many Muslims who are fleeing conflict?” Carey asked. “Surely if they are concerned for fellow Muslims who prefer to live in Muslim-majority countries, then they have a moral responsibility to intervene.”

In Australia, Muslim groups accused the government of bigotry for announcing in September that a plan to admit an additional 12,000 refugees from the conflict will prioritize “those most in need – the women, children and families of persecuted minorities.”

The Islamic Council of Victoria spokesman said it would be discriminatory to reject desperate Syrians, “based on their adherence to Islam.”

The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils said then-Prime Minister Tony Abbott must “take the high moral ground and stop bigots in his party from dividing the Australian community” by wanting to screen refugees on religious grounds.


(Agradeço a informação ao site da Pamela Geller)

5 comentários:

flavio disse...

O Diabo é o pai da mentira. O Diabo tem seguidores. E se a mentira tem pernas curtas, Obama é um anão.

Adilson disse...

Boa tarde, nobre Pedro.
Há um tempo me venho perguntando: é possível uma grande manifestações contra esse inimigo dos norte-americanos? Hoje, diante dessa postagem, resolvi te externar essa indagação. Há tantas comunidades cristãs naquele país que poderiam, ao menos na atual situação, se unirem nessa hora.

Abraços.

Pedro Erik disse...

Não sei bem se entendi sua pergunta, Adilson.
Mas se for sobre oposição a Obama, os EUA têm forte oposição e a popularidade do Obama não é alta.
Vários estados americanos já disseram que não querem refugiados. Isso não deve resolver, Obama deve forçar mas mostra força da oposição mesmo de gente do mesmo partido dele.
Mas a esquerda como aqui domina cultura e mídia.
Abraço,
Pedro Erik

Adilson disse...

Bom dia,meu nobre.
Obrigado por responder. Esqueci de especificar minha pergunta: por "manifestação" eu quis dizer grandes caminhadas, passeatas, manifestos, protestos ao ar livre. Como as últimas grandes marchas que ocorreram aqui no Brasil e aquelas boas marchas que os pró-vida costumam realizar nos EUA. Já que, como você mesmo frisou, ser forte a oposição popular (ao menos no discurso) contra Obama, o que se evidencia pelas chantagens, hipocrisia, distorção de palavras e desvios dos questionamentos que ele expressa.

Abraços.

Pedro Erik disse...

Sim, meu caro Adilson, milhares do chamado "Tea Party" já se reuniram em Washington diversas vezes e até pediram impeachment de Obama.
Inclusive com apoio de jornalistas, como Glenn Beck, e atores e atrizes. Os democratas ficaram assustados. Eu tenho até uma blusa do site de Glenn Beck, muito legal que diz "Truth has no Agenda".
E esse avanço do Tea Party elegeu diversos deputados e senadores que defendem sua pauta.

Abraço,
Pedro Erik