segunda-feira, 17 de junho de 2019

A Ideologia Política do Papa Francisco - "Peronista Guardia de Hierro" e "Povo Místico"

O jornalista italiano Sandro Magister fez um excelente artigo para mostrar a ideologia política do Papa Francisco, que abandona preceitos da fé em nome de políticas eivadas de mundanismo, como mudança climática e abertura aos imigrantes.

Vale muito a pena ler o artigo, que mostra a formação política de Bergoglio na Argentina na defesa do grupo peronista "Guardia  de Hierro" (guarda de ferro) e a formação ideológica dele em Rodolfo Kusch, pensador alemão que via o "povo da América Latina" como algo místico, algo bem Teologia da Libertação, que substitui Deus por "povo".

Aqui vão partes do artigo de Magister. leiam tudo no site dele:

From Ratzinger To Bergoglio. Two Political Visions Light Years Apart

by Sandro Magister

It is difficult, if not impossible, to find even a trace of Ratzinger’s vision in the idea of politics that is ingrained in Pope Francis, born instead from his experience of life, beginning with the Argentine ’68:
In Argentina, the student and labor uprisings flared up shortly after those in Paris or Los Angeles, in 1969, the year in which Bergoglio celebrated his first Mass, and immediately the militias joined the fray, the Montoneros, who in 1970, when he took his vows, kidnapped and executed former president Pedro Aramburu.
Precociously appointed novice master, the then 34-year-old Bergoglio completely espoused the cause of bringing back Juan Domingo Perón, who in those years was in exile in Madrid. He became the spiritual director of of the young Peronists of the Guardia de Hierro, who had a powerful presence at the Jesuit Universidad del Salvador. And he continued this militancy after his surprise appointment as provincial superior of the Jesuits of Argentina in 1973, the same year in which Perón returned to the country and won his triumphant reelection.
Bergoglio was among the writers of the “Modelo nacional,” the political testament that Perón wanted to leave after his death. And for all of this he drew the ferocious hostility of a good half of the Argentine Jesuits, more leftist than he, especially after he surrendered the Universidad del Salvador, which was put up for sale in order to stabilize the finances of the Society of Jesus, to none other than his friends of the Guardia de Hierro.
It was in those years that the future pope developed the “myth” - his word - of the people as protagonist of history. A word that by its nature is innocent and a bearer of innocence, a people with the innate right to “tierra, techo, trabajo” and that he sees as overlapping with the “santo pueblo fiel de Dios.”
But in addition to his experience of life, Bergoglio’s political vision also took shape thanks to the instruction of a teacher, as he confided to the French sociologist Dominique Wolton in a book-length interview that Wolton also edited, entitled “Politique et societé,” released in 2017:
“There is a thinker that you should read: Rodolfo Kusch, a German who lived in northwestern Argentina, an excellent philosopher and anthropologist. He made one thing clear: that the word ‘people’ is not a logical word. It is a mythical word. It is not possible to speak of people logically, because that would mean making only a description. In order to understand a people, to understand what are the values of this people, one must enter into the spirit, into the heart, into the work, into the history, and into the myth of its tradition. This point is truly at the basis of the theology called ‘of the people.’ That is to say, to go with the people, see how it expresses itself. This distinction is important. The people is not a logical category, it is a mythical category.”
An author of both anthropological and theatrical works, Rodolfo Kusch(1922-1979) took his inspiration from Heidegger’s philosophy to distinguish between “being” and “dwelling,” describing with the first category the rationalistic and domineering vision of Western man and with the second the vision of the indigenous Latin American peoples, in peace with nature and animated by none other than a “myth.”
For Kusch, the first of the two visions, the Eurocentric one, is intolerant and incapable of understanding the second, which he instead wanted to accentuate and to which he dedicated his most important studies. For this reason too he found himself at the margins of the culture of the dominant elites and instead found an admirer in Bergoglio.
So according to Bergoglio, “it takes a myth to understand the people.” And he has recounted this myth, as pope, above all when he called around him the “popular movements.” He has done it three times so far: the first time in Rome in 2014, the second in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, in 2015, the third again in Rome, in 2016. Every time he rouses the audience with endless speeches, of around thirty pages each, which when put together now form the political manifesto of this pope.
The movements that Francis calls to himself are not ones that he created, they preexist him. There is nothing overtly Catholic about them. They are in part the heirs of the memorable anti-capitalist and anti-globalization gatherings in Seattle and Porto Alegre. Plus the multitude of rejects from which the pope sees bursting forth “that torrent of moral energy which springs from including the excluded in the building of a common destiny.”
It is to these “discards of society” that Francis entrusts a future made of land, of housing, of work for all. Thanks to a process of their rise to power that “transcends the logical proceedings of formal democracy.” To the “popular movements,” on November 5, the pope said that the time has come to make a leap in politics, in order “to revitalize and recast the democracies, which are experiencing a genuine crisis.” In short, to upend the powerful from their thrones.
The powers against which the people of the excluded are rebelling, in the vision of the pope, are “the economic systems that in order to survive must wage war and thus restore economic balance,” they are “the economy that kills”. This is his key for explaining the “piecemeal world war” and even Islamic terrorism.
It can be added that at the first meeting in Rome and at the one in Santa Cruz there was present, in his capacity as “cocalero” activist, president of Bolivia Evo Morales, a champion of the populist left in Latin America.
Who was again invited to Rome, in April of 2016, as a speaker at the conference organized by the pontifical academy of sciences for the twenty-fifth anniversary of the social encyclical of John Paul II “Centesimus Annus,” together with fellow populist leader Rafael Correa, the president of Ecuador, neo-Malthusian economist Jeffrey Sachs, and the far-left Democratic candidate for the American presidency, Bernie Sanders:
Pope Francis received as a gift from him a letter from unspecified representatives of the “popular movements” and three books on the health benefits of coca, of which Morales himself is a fervent cultivator. And the farewell between the two - the agencies reported - was “very affectionate,” just the contrary of the opposition that the bishops of Bolivia have been carrying out against him there, going so far as to accuse him openly of “bringing drug trafficking into the structure of the state.” With the result that, back in Bolivia, Morales advised the bishops to “form openly a pro-capitalist and pro-imperialist party.” While on his side he exhibits the pope. Who “is content with what we have done and has told me: You always stand with the people”.
To the drawn-out speeches to the “popular movements” can be added the one Pope Francis gave on November 27, 2015 to the young people of the Nairobi slums, there too with the exaltation of the native “wisdom found in poor neighbourhoods,” as also, in the same perspective, his incessant gestures, journeys, and speeches concerning migrants.
But one must also take the same tack in reinterpreting the speech Bergoglio gave at the summit of Latin American judges convened at the Vatican in early June of 2019 - one year after a similar summit held in Buenos Aires - on the theme of social rights and of “Franciscan doctrine” (in reference not to Saint Francis of Assisi but to the pope who bears his name).
This too was a long speech, with extensive references to the second of the three addressed to the “popular movements,” the one given in Bolivia, and plainly written by a hand not his own even if in full agreement, perhaps by one of the Argentine judges present, Raúl Eugenio Zaffaroni, a prominent figure, member of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and supporter of a “critical theory” of criminology that traces the genesis of crime and the nature of justice back to the structure of the social classes and to inequality.
“There is no democracy with hunger, there is no progress with poverty, there is no justice with inequality”: this is how Francis summarized his vision, to thunderous applause.

2 comentários:

Adilson disse...

LAMENTÁVEL... Então, se não fosse a internet informações como essa sobre o papa passariam despercebidas, pois ficariam restritas apenas aqueles que acompanham de perto tudo isso; ou seja, aos que tivessem acesso à revistas, livros e artigos internacionais: a internet nos possibilitou esse tipo de acesso, pois tais fontes se tornaram acessíveis a qualquer momento e de qualquer lugar. Assim, nunca saberíamos o que realmente seriam os atos papais É o que aconteceu por exemplo com o herege do Dom Helder, caso na sua época houvesse a internet saberíamos em tempo real sobre suas verdadeiras intenções, seus atos, seus discursos e suas falas; hoje, nem sei como ter acesso ao que Helder fez, mas sobre o papa e o Vaticano, ou outra autoridade da Igreja, posso saber quase que diariamente.

Isac disse...

Entre os melhor informados, a partir de uns muito poucos bispos reativos contra ele, como D Viganò que teria acusado de o papa Francisco mentir, ele o papa Francisco já deveria ter o excomungado - mas creio que não valeria - pois pareceria estar nem aí para opositores, quereria prosseguir como suposto destruidor da Igreja! Teria dito que passaria como aquele que ajudou a rachar em duas a Igreja, com a igreja globalista, de aparencias de católica.
Nem tem nada disfarçado seus projetos e intentos, como apoiando o suposto Sínodo (das esquerdas) da Amazonia, senão com ações de esquerdistas!
Seria ele o abaixo?
... "E a fim de serem como o seu Mestre, estes, os eleitos, atuarão com confiança e, com a sua morte, obterão a vida eterna. Escolhendo obedecer a Deus em vez de obedecer aos homens, eles não terão medo de nada e preferirão morrer do que aprovar a falsidade e a traição.
Alguns pregadores manterão silêncio sobre a verdade, enquanto outros irão pisoteá-la e negá-la. A santidade de vida será desprezada até pelos que exteriormente a professam, pois, nesses dias, Nosso Senhor Jesus Cristo enviar-lhes-á não um pastor verdadeiro mas um destruidor.
(Works of the Seraphic Father St. Francis Of Assisi, Washbourne, London, 1882, pp. 248-250, Imprimatur of the Bishop of Birmingham, William Bernard – tradução livre)